Haven’t read the opinion. Probably won’t, tbh.
The law was identical to the one in Texas that was struck down in Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt.
I do think LA made some attempts to build a record that there was some benefit to the health of women (TX did not build any such record and conceded that they knew of no benefits) but there were other statements in the legislative record that showed that it was pretextual.
The only interesting things about this opinion, IMO, are that Roberts was in the minority on the Texas case but switched sides for this case and that Gorsuch did not go with Roberts to make it it 6-3 was a minor surprise to me. The outcome was the right one, legally. LA should have made a different law.