evillawyer
Kung Fu Kamala, B*tches!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 21,089
Big, big report from pro publica today. They got tax records for America's wealthiest, and not surprisingly, the wealthiest are playing the system to pay only a small percentage of their wealth over on taxes.
https://t.co/CRf09zPJkP?amp=1
Big, big report from pro publica today. They got tax records for America's wealthiest, and not surprisingly, the wealthiest are playing the system to pay only a small percentage of their wealth over on taxes.
Big, big report from pro publica today. They got tax records for America's wealthiest, and not surprisingly, the wealthiest are playing the system to pay only a small percentage of their wealth over on taxes.
I am about halfway through it. One thing of note so far, and EL's sentence structure gives insight to it, there is a lot of intermingling of "wealth", and "income". I think that is done intentionally.Can you give us a summary? I’d much rather hear you take over the shrew’s.
I am about halfway through it. One thing of note so far, and EL's sentence structure gives insight to it, there is a lot of intermingling of "wealth", and "income". I think that is done intentionally.
As you know, we do not have a wealth tax in this country. And income under our system is classified as earned and unearned which are taxed differently.
It's obvious the intent is to draw a narrative that a wealth tax is the way to go. Estate tax valuations are one of the most heavily contested aspects of our current tax system and a wealth tax is essentially going to be doing this every year.
A wealth tax is a stupid idea that is impossible to implement practically....
But hey, what do I know?
Ok based on the source and the water carrier I had assumed it was along those lines. Thanks for the info I won’t waste time reading it.I am about halfway through it. One thing of note so far, and EL's sentence structure gives insight to it, there is a lot of intermingling of "wealth", and "income". I think that is done intentionally.
As you know, we do not have a wealth tax in this country. And income under our system is classified as earned and unearned which are taxed differently.
The intent is also to get false information into the brains of people. Somewhere at a water cooler today some morons are talking about Buffett paying a 0.1% tax rate.
In the reddit thread there is considerable gnashing of teeth about tax law favoring the wealthy. But none of those socialists seem to understand (or maybe they don't WANT to admit) the people creating tax law are wealthy politicians in both parties.It's obvious the intent is to draw a narrative that a wealth tax is the way to go. Estate tax valuations are one of the most heavily contested aspects of our current tax system and a wealth tax is essentially going to be doing this every year.
Big, big report from pro publica today. They got tax records for America's wealthiest, and not surprisingly, the wealthiest are playing the system to pay only a small percentage of their wealth over on taxes.