Team Injury Report...

#128
#128
Anti-shunshinepumper said:
Kentucky fans finding out they will be without Jaxson Robinson in our rematch knowing that he was 4/9 from 3 with 17 points in the first go around


View attachment 721104
Click to expand...
Everytime one of these SEC teams find out they are missing a star player or players they go out and play their best game of the year. This probably worries me more than it does them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NighthawkVol, CAVPUT, Willy14 and 3 others
#130
#130
ColinS said:
Everytime one of these SEC teams find out they are missing a star player or players they go out and play their best game of the year. This probably worries me more than it does them.
Click to expand...
Still rather have that guy out than available.
They live and die by the 3- point shot.
He's one of their better 3 point shooters and has a knack for hitting baskets at the right time.
If we let them beat us missing a key player again, that's on us not taking advantage of an advantage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColinS
#131
#131
therickbol said:
Robinson worries me much more than Carr.

Of course with that said, I now expect Carr to go off for 30 points. I apologize in advance.
Click to expand...
Oh, I absolutely agree, there. Robinson is probably their 2nd best shooter. I'm just adding some perspective that they are losing his 13 ppg, but adding back Butler and Carr's 23 ppg which they didn't have when they beat us in Knoxville.
 
  • Like
Reactions: therickbol
#132
#132
ColinS said:
Everytime one of these SEC teams find out they are missing a star player or players they go out and play their best game of the year. This probably worries me more than it does them.
Click to expand...
I have noticed this, as well.

ZZ and Igor out vs Florida.

Alijah Martin out for UF vs Auburn.

Andrew Carr and Lamont Butler out for UK vs us.

Arkansas is 3-2 with Boogie Fland out, and won their first SEC game against UGA in their first game without him.
 
#135
#135
cncchris33 said:
I have noticed this, as well.

ZZ and Igor out vs Florida.

Alijah Martin out for UF vs Auburn.

Andrew Carr and Lamont Butler out for UK vs us.

Arkansas is 3-2 with Boogie Fland out, and won their first SEC game against UGA in their first game without him.
Click to expand...
Correlation doesn't imply causation.
Tennessee shot horrible against Kentucky
Arkansas had a lot of ex Kentucky players motivated to beat Kentucky and shot way above their average (Kentucky was also down their point guard). Florida shot crappy like we did against them when they played us at home. Was this all because of a different line up or were guys just off on these nights?
Hard to say for sure, but I'd take a team being without one of their roles players on any given night.
I'd be willing to bet if you complied the outcomes of games where a team was missing one of their key role players they fair worse than with that player in the majority of the time.
 
#136
#136
cardvolfan said:
Absolute declarations and basketball just don’t mix. We have a bunch of them on messsge boards these days.

That being said, I do think Barnes had his best coaching performance at Tennessee against Florida yesterday. I personally think Florida is built to do well in the postseason. Whether they do or not is an all together different thing.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? We NEVER have absolute declarations!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cardvolfan
#143
#143
Stoerner Fumbles said:
Oddly the science says there are the same or fewer ankle injuries with low tops. I’d feel naked in them, but apparently it’s true.
Click to expand...
I wonder if that takes into account that a lot of guys wearing low tops are also wearing ankle support/braces underneath their socks. I had to wear high tops but then switched to the mids later
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lefteye and Stoerner Fumbles
#144
#144
oldaaucoach said:
Hmm, I believe what you are saying but I would be curious to see how they measured that scientifically.
Click to expand...
Me too ... I want to see the research, the initial parameters, how they selected test subjects, how many test subjects were in the study, the pesky assumptions, and those troublesome limitations.
Call me a skeptic if you like ... I prefer analytic. I need to see the data with my own eyes.
I am not calling out SF or the research he was referring to ... I am having visions of all the research I reviewed back in my college days ... and how researchers are structuring models to prove what they already believe is true.
I might even be convinced that superior athlete's suffer less injuries in low tops. But I know how easy it is to turn my ankle these days, And back when I was much younger ... a compound fracture of my ankle ... is what makes me doubt the data. :^)
 
#146
#146
SN-A-C Orange said:
Me too ... I want to see the research, the initial parameters, how they selected test subjects, how many test subjects were in the study, the pesky assumptions, and those troublesome limitations.
Call me a skeptic if you like ... I prefer analytic. I need to see the data with my own eyes.
I am not calling out SF or the research he was referring to ... I am having visions of all the research I reviewed back in my college days ... and how researchers are structuring models to prove what they already believe is true.
I might even be convinced that superior athlete's suffer less injuries in low tops. But I know how easy it is to turn my ankle these days, And back when I was much younger ... a compound fracture of my ankle ... is what makes me doubt the data. :^)
Click to expand...
oldaaucoach said:
Hmm, I believe what you are saying but I would be curious to see how they measured that scientifically.
Click to expand...
With a Bunsen burner. How about this: Google “high tops vs low tops in relation to ankle injuries” and read the NIH study.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#147
#147
SN-A-C Orange said:
Me too ... I want to see the research, the initial parameters, how they selected test subjects, how many test subjects were in the study, the pesky assumptions, and those troublesome limitations.
Call me a skeptic if you like ... I prefer analytic. I need to see the data with my own eyes.
I am not calling out SF or the research he was referring to ... I am having visions of all the research I reviewed back in my college days ... and how researchers are structuring models to prove what they already believe is true.
I might even be convinced that superior athlete's suffer less injuries in low tops. But I know how easy it is to turn my ankle these days, And back when I was much younger ... a compound fracture of my ankle ... is what makes me doubt the data. :^)
Click to expand...
You definitely have to watch out for the low top lobby. They’re worse than Monsanto.
 
#148
#148
BernardKingGOAT said:
I wonder if that takes into account that a lot of guys wearing low tops are also wearing ankle support/braces underneath their socks. I had to wear high tops but then switched to the mids later
Click to expand...
To your support pt.. Old heads didn’t know anything about the tape jobs done today..
 
#150
#150
BernardKingGOAT said:
Those sort of informative studies need creative funding for the next 4 years😲
Click to expand...
From what I read there really isn't any correlation between High tops and Low tops as far as ankle injuries. This may have something to do with players being more prong to injury taping their ankle. I didn't see anything that breaks it down in regards to taping, tho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo and BernardKingGOAT
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top