SN-A-C Orange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 1,510
- Likes
- 2,368
Barnes frequently references 25 mpg ... that does not mean he can actually get there. You have to dance with who you got!
Barnes places value on minutes: So the question becomes which is the better value: 1 minute from a bone tired Santi or is 1 minute from a rested Edwards? Which is the better value.
So, Barnes plays the value game: he (the staff) may choose Santi at 80% for another minute vs Key at 100% for the next minute.
The staff has planned substitution patterns based on minutes, this is to try and keep the players rested and not worn down over the course of the season. This is taking the long view - less minutes is better.
Frankly, I am probably wrong on JJJ ... and his numbers do come down to 28ish .... that likely means those minutes are going to Phillips. This means that Phillips is giving high value minutes to the team.
To me the most valuable minutes are Santi and JJJ, but their minutes will not be productive without an excellent point guard on the floor.
Value minutes (and role acceptance) explains why Barnes starting players do not end up with the most minutes [Uros]. They are providing value minutes, but Uros at 90% might be LESS VALUE THAN than ON at 90% or Aidoo at 100%.
I suspect that UROS starts at the 5 simply because of experience, but gets replaced by Aidoo after 4-5 minutes.
I do think that we will see Philips numbers in the mid or upper 20s, if he can stay out of foul trouble on the defensive end of the court. (The only things that I can see that would limit his playing time is 1) foul trouble or 2) 'chemistry' with the players on the floor.)
Also, Barnes appears to 'experiment' with people at different positions to see what he gets. This is a growth mechanism as well as finding their limitations. This tends to skew minutes until Barnes finds the rotations and sets that he feels gives him the best advantages.
I sincerely hope that ON is back and better than he was last year, that would give us a more freedom to move guys around.
Overall assessment: this is a better 'team' than last year's team. Expecting the record and achievements to be at, near, or above the level of last year's team.
Barnes places value on minutes: So the question becomes which is the better value: 1 minute from a bone tired Santi or is 1 minute from a rested Edwards? Which is the better value.
So, Barnes plays the value game: he (the staff) may choose Santi at 80% for another minute vs Key at 100% for the next minute.
The staff has planned substitution patterns based on minutes, this is to try and keep the players rested and not worn down over the course of the season. This is taking the long view - less minutes is better.
Frankly, I am probably wrong on JJJ ... and his numbers do come down to 28ish .... that likely means those minutes are going to Phillips. This means that Phillips is giving high value minutes to the team.
To me the most valuable minutes are Santi and JJJ, but their minutes will not be productive without an excellent point guard on the floor.
Value minutes (and role acceptance) explains why Barnes starting players do not end up with the most minutes [Uros]. They are providing value minutes, but Uros at 90% might be LESS VALUE THAN than ON at 90% or Aidoo at 100%.
I suspect that UROS starts at the 5 simply because of experience, but gets replaced by Aidoo after 4-5 minutes.
I do think that we will see Philips numbers in the mid or upper 20s, if he can stay out of foul trouble on the defensive end of the court. (The only things that I can see that would limit his playing time is 1) foul trouble or 2) 'chemistry' with the players on the floor.)
Also, Barnes appears to 'experiment' with people at different positions to see what he gets. This is a growth mechanism as well as finding their limitations. This tends to skew minutes until Barnes finds the rotations and sets that he feels gives him the best advantages.
I sincerely hope that ON is back and better than he was last year, that would give us a more freedom to move guys around.
Overall assessment: this is a better 'team' than last year's team. Expecting the record and achievements to be at, near, or above the level of last year's team.