Does the committee want parity in the sport? If so, here's a quick take:
#1. GA wins out or 1 loss - no brainer, you want the drama of the defending champs trying to keep their title - good storyline
#2. Ohio State/Michigan winner - either will win the Big 10 with ease, both have been in CFP - OSU more frequently, but Michigan
made it in last year. I think only one makes it - even if Michigan wins.
#3. TCU - win out and they're in - not bad for the committee as they are 'new blood' to CFP. I think they made BCS bowls before,
but not CFB.
#4. UT - win out and they're in - started the season outside the top 25, ended losing streaks to UF, UA, LSU and many people have
been hyping a rematch between UT and UGA. Major overperformance by this team all season - feel good CFB story.
One loss Clemson - doesn't matter, they haven't been impressive and their SOS is not good - lost to unranked ND. People are tired of seeing Alabama and Clemson in the playoffs year in and year out.
One loss USC - don't think it will happen - still play at UCLA, ND at home, and PAC 12 Championship. If they do win out, it will need to be impressive as they only beat Oregon St by 3.
LSU - playing UGA in SEC Championship. Already have 2 losses and don't think they can pull off the win in Atlanta.
No one can predict the future and there are so many different variables. But I do like our shot; would be nice to get a little help from TCU and USC...