Yep, Darth, just like the men's team got dog whipped by O St. in March. So, here's my larger point to you again, using Coach Barnes: This college athletics business doesn't make logical sense.
Rick's been making final four money for a while even though he hadn't come close to sniffing a final four. And his underperformance in the ncaa tourney is at Tennessee what it was at Texas, or worse. He has yet to win an outright conference championship of any kind nor gone further than the SS in the tourney in his years at Tennessee. And yet he was just given a big raise to keep him among the very top men's coaches and an extension. He's begun recruiting at a very high level, but that hasn't translated to anything but disappointment so far. So, does that raise and extension make any logical sense by your criteria? No.
So, are you singling out Kellie for extensions that don't make sense? If so, why single her out?
Because this is a Lady Vol forum?
No, I wouldn't have given Barnes a raise. Frankly, I wouldn't have been upset if he left for UCLA a couple of years ago. With over 30 years of coaching, I think we know what Barnes is and what he isn't. As long has he continues having decent regular seasons, finishing at or near the top of the SEC, the powers that be seem content to overlook his postseason failures. It's rather sad that in spite of the Lady Vols' storied history of championships, now the definition of success for their program seems to be aligning closer and closer with the men's team...