S.C. OrangeMan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 1,257
- Likes
- 1,583
I think both aspects are true.
Donde Plowman and UT are badass for putting the NCAA in its place.
The lawsuits and actions of UT and the State of TN are integral in helping to change college football into something that's very uncomfortable for most fans.
It's unfortunate, but correct, that it came to this.
The NCAA had no choice but avoid starting NIL or compensating players because they can't legally control it without Antitrust issues which UT helped point out.
The NCAA had no choice but to avoid easing transfer restrictions for players because they can't legally control it without Antitrust issues which TN joined lawsuits to help point out.
The NCAA business model isn't legally workable but the solution sucks for fans. That UT and the State of TN helped dismantle the business model is simply a fact.
They could have tried not retroactively enforcing rules that didn't exist when the offense occurred.As we've seen, the NCAA standing still was the only choice to keep the dam from breaking.
Had they started "revenue sharing," they get sued by previous athletes because they didn't get revenue sharing (as they now have been in House v NCAA.)
Had they opened a portal earlier, they'd have gotten sued (as they did) to throw it wide open and make transfers look like they do now.
Had they started NIL, it would've spun completely out of control, as it has because of lawsuits like TN filed.
WHAT move would you have had them make that wouldn't leave us EXACTLY where we are now?
I'm not saying TN was wrong. I'm saying the NCAA couldn't keep an illegal business model working no matter what they did.They could have tried not retroactively enforcing rules that didn't exist when the offense occurred.
Could you imagine getting pulled over because the speed limit changed to 45 yesterday but last week a cop saw you doing 55 ( when it was 55)?
That's pretty much what the NCAA did. Of course Tennessee was forced to defend itself.