SentinelVol
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2018
- Messages
- 44
- Likes
- 254
Don't expect this clown back but feels good to put a bow on this one.If you just compare talent and experience by position group here is how I see it:
QB- Deacon Hill has more experience but played poorly on the whole. Nico more talent but very little experience. PUSH
Vols 232, Iowa 113. Sampson dominated like I said. Their top rusher was the back up QB with 51 yds. Without him, UT would have held them under 100 in both rushing and passing.RB- Iowa has 3 experienced backs and UT is down their top 2. IOWA
UT needs help at WR. If Bru comes back with the additions... it should be better next fall. Iowa's WRs suck including Brown.WR- Besides former top 100 recruit Kaleb Brown, the hawks lack here obviously. Even in a down year for your standards you guys have a big advantage here. UT
LOL. It wasn't "close". Their TEs were a non-factor. Warren and Castles were significantly better.TE- Even with two NFL players out due to injury this isn’t close. IOWA
I expected UT to have more guys available. But even with only 2 starters... the Vols were better vs Iowa's D than Iowa's OL was vs UT's.OL- Iowa has been very inconsistent up front but has had games where they dominate on the ground. UT is beat up and down a lot of guys. PUSH
LOL. The guys playing behind Baron... were as productive or more so than he has been. UT gashed them in the run game with their back up OL. Sacks were ugly both ways...except that was Iowa's first team OL.DL- UT lost Baron, but has had a better pass rush than the Hawks this year. Iowa is deeper and better against the run. Without Baron it’s IOWA.
Made a bunch of tackles which looks nice in the box score... except they were making a lot of them in the 2nd and 3rd levelLB- two all Americans and a 2nd team all B1G player for the hawks IOWA.
LOL... indeed. UT's young secondary held up well. The commentators kept questioning why Iowa didn't go after UT's young DBs. The fact that they didn't... and couldn't... suggests that they did a pretty good job.DB- Lol. IOWA
Iowa has a great punter... or it would have been A LOT worse. Kicker got one kick all day... LOLSpecial teams- 2023 All American punter and 2022 all American kicker IOWA
UT was better everywhere... except punter.I don’t think UT is better anywhere besides receiver.
Iowa’s punter probably has a sore foot after that game.Don't expect this clown back but feels good to put a bow on this one.
Nico>>>>>>>anyone Iowa could have played including the Michigan transfer.
Vols 232, Iowa 113. Sampson dominated like I said. Their top rusher was the back up QB with 51 yds. Without him, UT would have held them under 100 in both rushing and passing.
UT needs help at WR. If Bru comes back with the additions... it should be better next fall. Iowa's WRs suck including Brown.
LOL. It wasn't "close". Their TEs were a non-factor. Warren and Castles were significantly better.
I expected UT to have more guys available. But even with only 2 starters... the Vols were better vs Iowa's D than Iowa's OL was vs UT's.
LOL. The guys playing behind Baron... were as productive or more so than he has been. UT gashed them in the run game with their back up OL. Sacks were ugly both ways...except that was Iowa's first team OL.
Made a bunch of tackles which looks nice in the box score... except they were making a lot of them in the 2nd and 3rd level
LOL... indeed. UT's young secondary held up well. The commentators kept questioning why Iowa didn't go after UT's young DBs. The fact that they didn't... and couldn't... suggests that they did a pretty good job.
Iowa has a great punter... or it would have been A LOT worse. Kicker got one kick all day... LOL
UT was better everywhere... except punter.
Wow, how do you explain 35-0? Going into the game, I’d had Tennessee with edge in all areas on offense (how could you think different) & push on DL.If you just compare talent and experience by position group here is how I see it:
QB- Deacon Hill has more experience but played poorly on the whole. Nico more talent but very little experience. PUSH
RB- Iowa has 3 experienced backs and UT is down their top 2. IOWA
WR- Besides former top 100 recruit Kaleb Brown, the hawks lack here obviously. Even in a down year for your standards you guys have a big advantage here. UT
TE- Even with two NFL players out due to injury this isn’t close. IOWA
OL- Iowa has been very inconsistent up front but has had games where they dominate on the ground. UT is beat up and down a lot of guys. PUSH
DL- UT lost Baron, but has had a better pass rush than the Hawks this year. Iowa is deeper and better against the run. Without Baron it’s IOWA.
LB- two all Americans and a 2nd team all B1G player for the hawks IOWA.
DB- Lol. IOWA
Special teams- 2023 All American punter and 2022 all American kicker IOWA
I don’t think UT is better anywhere besides receiver.