NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 56,766
- Likes
- 82,465
Thanks. I now have an interest in all of this. Got a daughter and family (including a 2 year old granddaughter) in Houston who went 72 hours with no power. Fortunate to have been able to rotate with some families who had periodic power and water and only had one small pipe break which they shut down the first day with minimal damage and a buddy fixed it for them today. Could have been a whole lot worse.
Wife was able to take her frustration out on 3 pallets of drums this morning putting that stretch wrap in there for me. And then she shut off the water to our house because we sprung a small leak in the piping inside the walls in the master bathroom. Even though we never lost power at our house. Good luck getting a plumber in Texas this month or next.
Wife was able to take her frustration out on 3 pallets of drums this morning putting that stretch wrap in there for me. And then she shut off the water to our house because we sprung a small leak in the piping inside the walls in the master bathroom. Even though we never lost power at our house. Good luck getting a plumber in Texas this month or next.
One of the interesting facts that I learned from the NR article is that a lot of the compression equipment necessary to push natural gas from wellheads up to pipeline pressure (typically 500 to 800 psig) and move it through the system is now run by electric motors instead of natural-gas-fired IC engines... talk about eating your own. So this just compounded the problem. Kind of hard to keep natural gas flowing to the power plants that need it, when you need electricity to run those compressors and can't get it!Found it. This ties in what what some engineers were saying in a link I provided earlier as well as an opinion piece I posted.
I donāt know if we actually need to add natural gas capacity or insure the natural gas capacity plus reserves have a hardened fuel delivery system. What Iāve read thus far implies the latter but it could really be a mix of both. Some of the engineers in the national review article seemed to indicate that.
https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/82R/billtext/pdf/HB01986I.pdf#navpanes=0
I'm actually a pretty fair hand when it comes to piping. My old friend and mentor (RIP) used to joke that a chemical engineer is just an "overeducated plumber". But nowadays I'm so busy just running the business that I am only too happy to hire help to do the things I used to do my own self. As a consequence, my wife has become "the man around the house" too. When we first got married she didn't know which end of a screwdriver was the business end, but nowadays she does more maintenance around the house than I do... she's actually pretty good at watching YouTube videos about how to do stuff like sheetrock repair etc.Good Lord .... getting a plumber in Texas to fix a water pipe after that disaster? You'll have to break open your 401K account to pay off the bill.
Yeah I saw the gas equipment change out too. IdiotsOne of the interesting facts that I learned from the NR article is that a lot of the compression equipment necessary to push natural gas from wellheads up to pipeline pressure (typically 500 to 800 psig) and move it through the system is now run by electric motors instead of natural-gas-fired IC engines... talk about eating your own. So this just compounded the problem. Kind of hard to keep natural gas flowing to the power plants that need it, when you need electricity to run those compressors and can't get it!
As an aside - I saw some posts yesterday talking about NG pipelines "freezing" and this had me a little bit puzzled because the main arteries of the NG distribution system - the big pipelines that connect the producing areas with consumers across the state and the nation - require the gas be dry before they accept it, in most cases having to meet a spec of "max. 7 lbs of moisture per million standard cubic feet of gas" which is equivalent to around 20 ppm of moisture...
It was mentioned in the NR article that freezing problems were occurring at the wellhead, which does make sense, as the NG is wet coming out of the ground but gets dried out in "midstream processing plants" where the heavier HCs are condensed and sold as the more valuable liquid fractions (propane, butane etc.) while the lighter fraction which is mostly methane (and a little ethane) gets dried in the process of becoming "sales gas" before being fed into the distribution system. So in effect it was the midstream processors not being able to get their normal volume of raw gas from the wellheads/producing areas that led to the supply pinch that forced a lot of NG-fired power producers offline during the crisis.
I do a lot of plumbing myself too. If we had an issue depending on where it was I might try to tackle it. But I donāt have any PEX crimpers or other tools. Would defer to a plumber on PEX repair but I could at least open to up and isolate it so it would be a quick repair.I'm actually a pretty fair hand when it comes to piping. My old friend and mentor (RIP) used to joke that a chemical engineer is just an "overeducated plumber". But nowadays I'm so busy just running the business that I am only too happy to hire help to do the things I used to do my own self. As a consequence, my wife has become "the man around the house" too. When we first got married she didn't know which end of a screwdriver was the business end, but nowadays she does more maintenance around the house than I do... she's actually pretty good at watching YouTube videos about how to do stuff like sheetrock repair etc.
Oh. And Abbott decreed that if anybody got pinched on gas availability it was non residential customers. He stated that ATMOS was to Service residential first. Not really sure if that helped or hurt honestly. It clearly did help us.One of the interesting facts that I learned from the NR article is that a lot of the compression equipment necessary to push natural gas from wellheads up to pipeline pressure (typically 500 to 800 psig) and move it through the system is now run by electric motors instead of natural-gas-fired IC engines... talk about eating your own. So this just compounded the problem. Kind of hard to keep natural gas flowing to the power plants that need it, when you need electricity to run those compressors and can't get it!
As an aside - I saw some posts yesterday talking about NG pipelines "freezing" and this had me a little bit puzzled because the main arteries of the NG distribution system - the big pipelines that connect the producing areas with consumers across the state and the nation - require the gas be dry before they accept it, in most cases having to meet a spec of "max. 7 lbs of moisture per million standard cubic feet of gas" which is equivalent to around 20 ppm of moisture...
It was mentioned in the NR article that freezing problems were occurring at the wellhead, which does make sense, as the NG is wet coming out of the ground but gets dried out in "midstream processing plants" where the heavier HCs are condensed and sold as the more valuable liquid fractions (propane, butane etc.) while the lighter fraction which is mostly methane (and a little ethane) gets dried in the process of becoming "sales gas" before being fed into the distribution system. So in effect it was the midstream processors not being able to get their normal volume of raw gas from the wellheads/producing areas that led to the supply pinch that forced a lot of NG-fired power producers offline during the crisis.
Maybe we can get Bill Gates to pay? After all he lives in a 60,000 square foot house and he travels in a private jet. The next 10 generations of his progeny will pollute as much as all of the members of Volnation combined will.
Right, dew points in the distribution system are going to be extremely low, like -40 or below (course, the higher the pressure the less moisture you have at saturation at a given temperature too). Two reasons moisture levels need to be low: (1) corrosion, as you correctly pointed out, and (2) it don't burn (sales gas has to meet a BTU spec too).Yeah I saw the gas equipment change out too. Idiots
I assumed the gas in the large distribution lines had to be dried to a certain level if for no other reason than pipeline corrosion. No idea what the equivalent dew point would be for that mixture but I would expect it to be below 0F.
There are various pipeline access points in the network that pop above ground and I was wondering if that was a problem point. But if the gas mixture is ādryā...
Yes I read in multiple places that a huge number of well heads had frozen up. And again in a lot of cases this is private party equipment. I hunted on a 4-6 section ranch (1 section = 1 sq mi) regularly that ran cattle and had gas wellheads, piping, and local storage all out in the open. The gas coming up has to be very āwetā since the deep temperatures are very hot.
I donāt know why the gas plants donāt have local emergency LNG storage. I wonder if this event will pass a pain threshold which would make it economically feasible.Right, dew points in the distribution system are going to be extremely low, like -40 or below (course, the higher the pressure the less moisture you have at saturation at a given temperature too). Two reasons moisture levels need to be low: (1) corrosion, as you correctly pointed out, and (2) it don't burn (sales gas has to meet a BTU spec too).
It would make more sense for the power plants to have some LNG storage - except converting NG into LNG itself in the first place is a rather complex cryogenic process and is generally done only on a very large scale e.g. at export terminals where they load big ships with it.I donāt know why the gas plants donāt have local emergency LNG storage. I wonder if this event will pass a pain threshold which would make it economically feasible.
I donāt see how you solve the wellhead problem. You tell a bunch of ranchers or their production subcontractors you need to now put this extra equipment on all your wellheads and collection tanks. They will say piss off. And the big corporate producers will just pass that cost on to the consumer ... as usual.
Yep I had assumed that the liquefaction would have to occur off site and then the LNG would have to be transported to some reserve tanks on site. But in liquid form you can store a crap ton of gas. As you said thatās how the tankers transport it. Will be interested to see if they consider either any local plant storage or maybe distribution point storage? Phase transition back to gas then just put it into the pipes as usual? Iām way out of my element here admittedly.It would make more sense for the power plants to have some LNG storage - except converting NG into LNG itself in the first place is a rather complex cryogenic process and is generally done only on a very large scale e.g. at export terminals where they load big ships with it.
As for the wellhead freezing issue, I don't think it would take a lot of time or money to prevent that. It's only a matter of installing some additional insulation and/or steam tracing or electrical tracing, to keep from forming ice inside of lines and vessels where water is generally present in liquid form already... something they already do in places like the Panhandle where it gets well below freezing regularly every winter...
Liquid nitrogen is distributed in everything from tank trucks to small thermos type containers, so it's not that much of a stretch to think LNG storage at a power plant wouldn't be a good idea and could be safely done. With that type of storage - unless you have cryogenic refrigeration on the storage tank to keep it from building up pressure you have to have a certain boil-off rate that essentially removes the heat that it picks up through the walls of the tank, but this could be managed... primarily by letting some vapor off into the intake of the turbine generators. In my first job out of college I worked in a large petrochemical plant where we had liquid storage of a cryogenic volatile product, vinyl chloride monomer, which at the time had just come under increasing regulation as a carcinogen (linked to liver cancer)... I was the computer control guy in a new VCM unit through start-up, and we had 3 or 4 huge, double-walled spherical tanks we stored product in, right on the banks of the Mississippi River, for loading ships and barges (a few miles up from New Orleans). It ain't really rocket science.Yep I had assumed that the liquefaction would have to occur off site and then the LNG would have to be transported to some reserve tanks on site. But in liquid form you can store a crap ton of gas. As you said thatās how the tankers transport it. Will be interested to see if they consider either any local plant storage or maybe distribution point storage? Phase transition back to gas then just put it into the pipes as usual? Iām way out of my element here admittedly.
Man those coal plants we deactivated in recent years...
That's absurd. The argument that wind is not to blame is that out of the 30 GW capacity, ERCOT was only counting on 4 GW. And since it provided about 4 GW, then it can't be to blame. i.e. reliably unreliable. If you stack a lineup with .200 hitters, and then lose. You can't say you didn't lose because of the 0.200 hitters because nobody expected them to hit. Yes, you did because they suck and you can't rely on them. They never should have spent money on wind that's a throwaway power source. They should have invested that in more firm resources like nuclear or their gas supply lines. Did they lose nuclear capacity, yes. But nuclear is still running through this at an 80% capacity compared to the 15% of wind.
I've seen this from multiple energy experts. The people whose policy we will he following. I have no faith in experts when it's blatant propoganda.
So I read somewhere that we basically delivered an entire months energy level in four days or so. Iād guess there is some simple first order math that could be done to see how many LNG tanks could be added to the main distribution pipelines and as you said just let it bleed off as required to maintain safe pressures. And we knew close to three weeks ahead of time this was coming. Plenty of time to top off the LNG tanks I think. To your point the distribution gas have to be kept very dry for burning as well as corrosion so if that holds up and the delivery piping wasnāt the issue then it would seem like that could feed the distribution network.Liquid nitrogen is distributed in everything from tank trucks to small thermos type containers, so it's not that much of a stretch to think LNG storage at a power plant wouldn't be a good idea and could be safely done. With that type of storage - unless you have cryogenic refrigeration on the storage tank to keep it from building up pressure you have to have a certain boil-off rate that essentially removes the heat that it picks up through the walls of the tank, but this could be managed... primarily by letting some vapor off into the intake of the turbine generators. In my first job out of college I worked in a large petrochemical plant where we had liquid storage of a cryogenic volatile product, vinyl chloride monomer, which at the time had just come under increasing regulation as a carcinogen (linked to liver cancer)... I was the computer control guy in a new VCM unit through start-up, and we had 3 or 4 huge, double-walled spherical tanks we stored product in, right on the banks of the Mississippi River, for loading ships and barges (a few miles up from New Orleans). It ain't really rocket science.
I'd love to see that plumber walk into a Starbucks and get his Latte from the tatted up PhD behind the counter. LOLEvery Texas plumber in two weeks.
View attachment 353276
Just as a ballpark number, LNG has about 10x the energy density (i.e. BTU per ft3 of storage tank) compared to methane at 500 psig. LNG as an emergency reserve for power plants does make some sense.So I read somewhere that we basically delivered an entire months energy level in four days or so. Iād guess there is some simple first order math that could be done to see how many LNG tanks could be added to the main distribution pipelines and as you said just let it bleed off as required to maintain safe pressures. And we knew close to three weeks ahead of time this was coming. Plenty of time to top off the LNG tanks I think. To your point the distribution gas have to be kept very dry for burning as well as corrosion so if that holds up and the delivery piping wasnāt the issue then it would seem like that could feed the distribution network.
Iām assuming the methane at the plant side is low pressure delivery also? I know residential delivery is specified in In-H20 since it is such low pressure. Just a handful of psi.Just as a ballpark number, LNG has about 10x the energy density (i.e. BTU per ft3 of storage tank) compared to methane at 500 psig. LNG as an emergency reserve for power plants does make some sense.
Another good read. From engineers. Not frigging politicians or ājournalistsā
Texas Electricity Crisis: Engineers Explain What Went Wrong | National Review
Itās likely the same kinds of failures are behind much of Texasās recent trouble. Itās also likely that there was a kind of vicious cycle at play: In an effort to improve their environmental profiles, oil and gas operators have spent years replacing gas-driven compressors and other parts with electric equipment. Without electricity, that equipment fails and the gas stops flowing to the electrical plants, reducing their ability to keep up with demand elsewhere. Blackouts can cause more blackouts by taking electrical plantsā fuel-delivery systems offline.