Thank you President Trump!

#52
#52
I don't bitch about trump, i mock him and those that support him as being degenerates.

I'm fully OK with all of the SCOTUS rulings, I think they're long overdue.

I guess as long as people continue to have independent thought and think trump is trash, we'll continued to be called libtards.

I can live with that.
I can accept that but you basically called the ruling a an activist ruling
Why..because when one says Trump, you have this auto reflex
I understand but **** man..you throw the baby out with the bath water
 
#53
#53
I don't bitch about trump, i mock him and those that support him as being degenerates.

I'm fully OK with all of the SCOTUS rulings, I think they're long overdue.

I guess as long as people continue to have independent thought and think trump is trash, we'll continued to be called libtards.

I can live with that.


Personally I’m good with you thinking Trump is trash while simultaneously supporting the rulings of the justices he appointed.

I know many conservatives that can’t stand Trump whatsoever. But they are thankful for his court appointments.

I don’t struggle with people hating Trump. I struggle with people believing Joe Biden, as the executive, has the authority to force you to pay off my student loans. Indirectly of course.
 
#54
#54
I can accept that but you basically called the ruling a an activist ruling
Why..because when one says Trump, you have this auto reflex
I understand but **** man..you throw the baby out with the bath water

I didn't call it an activist ruling. I was just pointing out that the gloating over the partisan appointments was once derided by the same people. The hypocrisy is delicious.

If you had a couple of brain cells to rub together you could have figured it out. Instead you just screech.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DinkinFlicka
#55
#55
Personally I’m good with you thinking Trump is trash while simultaneously supporting the rulings of the justices he appointed.

I know many conservatives that can’t stand Trump whatsoever. But they are thankful for his court appointments.

I don’t struggle with people hating Trump. I struggle with people believing Joe Biden, as the executive, has the authority to force you to pay off my student loans. Indirectly of course.
I actually agreed with many of Trump's agenda items, I just think he was too much of a dumb trash bag to implement them properly. I guess that makes me a libtard.
 
#56
#56
I didn't call it an activist ruling. I was just pointing out that the gloating over the partisan appointments was once derided by the same people. The hypocrisy is delicious.

If you had a couple of brain cells to rub together you cold have figured it out. Instead you just screech.
Glorious comment
 
#57
#57
I actually agreed with many of Trump's agenda items, I just think he was too much of a dumb trash bag to implement them properly. I guess that makes me a libtard.

This just look sad at this point
 
#58
#58
I know this will get merged. But thank you Trump for not being some far left looney-tune liberal that would have chosen liberal advocates for the SCOTUS instead of constitutional scholars.



Love him or hate him, he got this right!


Constitutional scholars? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! You don't even know the meaning of the term. None of the conservatives on the court is a constitutional scholar. Constitutional scholars tend to be academics, not judges.
 
#59
#59
Don’t forget a big thank you to Mitch McConnell for keeping the partisan left wing hack Garland off the SC

Yea, now we've got a court full of right-wing hacks who are far less intelligent and far more politicized than Garland.

Clarence Thomas? Gorsuch? Alito? :eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
#60
#60
I actually agreed with many of Trump's agenda items, I just think he was too much of a dumb trash bag to implement them properly. I guess that makes me a libtard.
That really doesn't make any sense. All except the libtard part.
 
#61
#61
That really doesn't make any sense. All except the libtard part.


I think what he’s saying is he agreed with the message (ideas) but hated the messenger.

To be fair. I would rather people support good ideology than support the person pushing the ideology. Trump is eventually gonna move on. But We need people to embrace good ideas over sh*tty ideas for the sake of our Republic.
 
#62
#62
I think what he’s saying is he agreed with the message (ideas) but hated the messenger.

To be fair. I would rather people support good ideology than support the person pushing the ideology. Trump is eventually gonna move on. But We need people to embrace good ideas over sh*tty ideas for the sake of our Republic.

Yes. It's really a pretty easy concept to embrace. I think the "with us or against us" crowd when it comes to sniffing Trump's jock, are pretty low IQ. Same can be said of the Biden sycophants.
 
Last edited:
#66
#66
I actually agreed with many of Trump's agenda items, I just think he was too much of a dumb trash bag to implement them properly. I guess that makes me a libtard.
Thinks it the fact your overly critic on Trump and GOP while basically ignoring all the Dems and Bide stuff...even defending it..that take you out of the libertarian relm and into libtard
 
#67
#67
The people that wrote the constitution were radicals, these guys on the court are mere enthusiasts.

They were a bunch of European rejects and Masons. Not that there's anything wrong with that but put it in better perspective. The bunch on the Supreme Court is there to ensure that the law is implemented correctly based on their interpretation as it supports the Constitution without drawing a conclusion based on party lines.
 
Last edited:
#68
#68
Yea, now we've got a court full of right-wing hacks who are far less intelligent and far more politicized than Garland.

Clarence Thomas? Gorsuch? Alito? :eek::eek::eek::eek:
Since we all know you only measure intelligence using degrees you might want to look up Gorsuch’s academic background.
 
#70
#70
Yea, now we've got a court full of right-wing hacks who are far less intelligent and far more politicized than Garland.

Clarence Thomas? Gorsuch? Alito? :eek::eek::eek::eek:
No, we’ve got a majority of the court that actually follows the Constitution. I guess I owe RBG a yuuuge thank you as well for not retiring when the dems wanted her to 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#72
#72
What is going to eventually happen is that we will start to see the leftists just ignore the rulings of the Supreme Court if they do not like them, and just do what ever they want. If there is a leftist DOJ in command like there is now, then there will be no effective enforcement arm.
 
#73
#73
Thinks it the fact your overly critic on Trump and GOP while basically ignoring all the Dems and Bide stuff...even defending it..that take you out of the libertarian relm and into libtard

What have I defended? Certainly you can cite some examples.

I'll hang up and listen.
 
#74
#74
What is going to eventually happen is that we will start to see the leftists just ignore the rulings of the Supreme Court if they do not like them, and just do what ever they want. If there is a leftist DOJ in command like there is now, then there will be no effective enforcement arm.
I am afraid it could be worse than that. We’ve seen Schumer openly threaten SC justices before and someone tried to act. With all the crap the left is saying the last 48 hours these 6 justices hopefully are protected
 
#75
#75
What is going to eventually happen is that we will start to see the leftists just ignore the rulings of the Supreme Court if they do not like them, and just do what ever they want. If there is a leftist DOJ in command like there is now, then there will be no effective enforcement arm.

A must see for those that want to be educated about the attacks on the SCOTUS by Dems.

 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol

VN Store



Back
Top