That's racist!

#9,030
#9,030
utvolpj said:
The political party myth is useless. Anyone claiming something done 150-200 years ago by their current political party is really stretching the truth
Click to expand...

I don’t think that women is just talking about something that happened 150-200 years ago .. nice cherry picking . Why am I not surprised when I said see if our liberal friends rebut her , that you are the first to try it ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and Rickyvol77
#9,032
#9,032
0nelilreb said:
I don’t think that women is just talking about something that happened 150-200 years ago .. nice cherry picking . Why am I not surprised when I said see if our liberal friends rebut her , that you are the first to try it ?
Click to expand...
Cherry picking? I addressed a main point in her rant. Much of it was just repetitive. Sorry for attempting a discussion you begged for. It won't happen again
 
#9,033
#9,033
utvolpj said:
Cherry picking? I addressed a main point in her rant. Much of it was just repetitive. Sorry for attempting a discussion you begged for. It won't happen again
Click to expand...

So after listen to everything she said , you only heard her talking about what a party did 150-200 years ago ? Sorry for accusing you of cherry picking , it sounds more like selective hearing .
 
#9,034
#9,034
0nelilreb said:
So after listen to everything she said , you only heard her talking about what a party did 150-200 years ago ? Sorry for accusing you of cherry picking , it sounds more like selective hearing .
Click to expand...
No I simply addressed one of her main points. Is it all or nothing? That's a terrible way to have any discussion
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#9,035
#9,035
utvolpj said:
No I simply addressed one of her main points. Is it all or nothing? That's a terrible way to have any discussion
Click to expand...

So you decided the way to rebut her claim is to choose one thing she talked about to dismiss the rest of her talking points ? Now we are back to you cherry picking . That by the way is a horrible way to rebut someone multi point stance and why she believes the democratic candidate is worse that the Republican one . Would you like to rebut anything she’s saying that pertains to this century ?
 
#9,036
#9,036
0nelilreb said:
So you decided the way to rebut her claim is to choose one thing she talked about to dismiss the rest of her talking points ? Now we are back to you cherry picking . That by the way is a horrible way to rebut someone multi point stance and why she believes the democratic candidate is worse that the Republican one . Would you like to rebut anything she’s saying that pertains to this century ?
Click to expand...
Are you serious with this? Addressing one doesn't mean dismissing others. Good grief this is ridiculous
 
#9,037
#9,037
utvolpj said:
Are you serious with this? Addressing one doesn't mean dismissing others. Good grief this is ridiculous
Click to expand...

Your cherry picking was ridiculous. We both know it . You are just can’t stop digging the hole deeper .
 
#9,039
#9,039
0nelilreb said:
Your cherry picking was ridiculous. We both know it . You are just can’t stop digging the hole deeper .
Click to expand...
If there are many points made is no one allowed to choose one to start a discussion you requested multiple times? I refuted a point in the video which is why you bumped your own post right? You simply didn't like the one I chose ( which was a main one in her rant) and then claimed I was avoiding and needed to address all of it. You've made a ridiculous stance on this. Good luck getting anyone else to play your little carnival game
 
#9,040
#9,040
utvolpj said:
If there are many points made is no one allowed to choose one to start a discussion you requested multiple times? I refuted a point in the video which is why you bumped your own post right? You simply didn't like the one I chose ( which was a main one in her rant) and then claimed I was avoiding and needed to address all of it. You've made a ridiculous stance on this. Good luck getting anyone else to play your little carnival game
Click to expand...

You chose a very specific point for a reason . You still haven’t rebutted anything else besides ..Muh 150 years ago . I wasn’t going to have any luck getting anyone to rebut it to start with because the woman was laying down facts that’s hard as hell to refute . I still find it interesting that you wanted to try , you know not being a liberal and all . Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#9,041
#9,041
0nelilreb said:
You chose a very specific point for a reason . You still haven’t rebutted anything else besides ..Muh 150 years ago . I wasn’t going to have any luck getting anyone to rebut it to start with because the woman was laying down facts that’s hard as hell to refute . I still find it interesting that you wanted to try , you know not being a liberal and all . Lol
Click to expand...
Yeah i picked one to refute since it was wrong and a useless, but oft-repeated, talking point of the right. Am I only allowed to address ones you want? Why don't you refute my argument?

Add to your last sentence, did you want no one else but liberals to discuss your video? I believe there are about 3 of them on here so next time just yeah then and limit the discussion that way. You seem to have wanted something very specific but are upset when it got turned around. Interesting debate style
 
#9,042
#9,042
utvolpj said:
Yeah i picked one to refute since it was wrong and a useless but oft-repeated talking point of the right. Am I only allowed to address ones you want? Why don't you refute my argument?

Add to your last sentence, did you want no one else but liberals to discuss your video? I believe there are about 3 of them on here so next time just yeah then and limit the discussion that way. You seem to have wanted something very specific but are upset when it got turned around. Interesting debate style
Click to expand...

First ..it’s not my video . Second.. I actually did say I was waiting on our liberal friends to rebut her . Third BE07975C-6743-41D8-B735-1012C655300E.gif ..Still waiting on anything else she said to be rebutted .
 
#9,045
#9,045
0nelilreb said:
If thats your standard and its good enough for you , it’s good enough for me .
Click to expand...
You asked for a rebuttal and got a valid one that you choose to ignore. Maybe someone else will attempt the one you obviously are preparing for and won't surprise you. Best of luck
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#9,046
#9,046
utvolpj said:
You asked for a rebuttal and got a valid one that you choose to ignore. Maybe someone else will attempt the one you obviously are preparing for and won't surprise you. Best of luck
Click to expand...

I didn’t ignore it , I called it out for what it was Cherry picking . I don’t have to prepare for anything , I didn’t say any of it , she did . You are ( or I thought you were ) smarter than to dig this hole . You haven’t rebutted anything of substance the woman said .
 
Last edited:
#9,047
#9,047
GettyImages-1184535566.jpg

A minor part of the University of Virginia’s new athletics logo has apparently caused major offense, leading to the announcement that a second new logo will be created.

UVA introduced a new athletics logo on April 24, which featured the school’s large gray “V” outlined in orange with two sabers underneath, Fox News reported. The “grips of the sabers were supposed to mimic ‘the design of the serpentine walls found on the Grounds,’” the outlet reported.

The serpentine walls, however, were originally erected at the school in the 1820s to ensure students and faculty didn’t have to see slaves working on the other side. In the 1950s, the walls were removed and replaced with shorter ones that still occupy the space today. UVA athletics director Carla Williams apologized for the new design of the program’s logo, which featured small marks on the handle of the sabers that looked like grips but apparently represented the walls.

“After the release of our new logos on April 24, I was made aware of the negative connotation between the serpentine walls and slavery,” Williams said. “I was not previously aware of the historical perspective indicating the original eight-foot-high walls were constructed to mask the institution of slavery and enslaved laborers from public view.”

Racism Allegations Lead University Of Virginia To Change Its Athletics Logo For Second Time This Year
 
#9,049
#9,049
GoBigOrangeUT said:
No way this is serious
Click to expand...
I found two sites I have never heard of talking about it. Indy100 and Meaww(?)
Seems like she did tweet positively about Dominos back in 2015. it alledgely resurfaced and people alledgely think dominos has aligned themselves with Trump because of a tweet from 5 years ago.

I honestly hadnt heard of any of this before, still seems farfetched even if the original tweet was legit.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top