That's racist!

No one has accused luther of being intellectually honest. In fact, if you put luther's intellectual honesty on a continuum, well, ….
I honestly think Luther is a decent guy, I think he's skewed by his political prejudices like most of us are. I'm trying to appeal to the logical, which as a member of the teaching community I'm sure he values at some level. He's not a bad dude, I believe he knows that some of the foundation his political beliefs are built on are compromised. That's not a very comfortable feeling, I've been there.
 
I refuse to engage with these morons with TDS on this board for this reason.

You CANNOT have a rational conversation with an irrational person.

It is like arguing with an angry wife. Facts, honesty, and logic mean nothing...its all about the feels...and even when you're right, to them you are wrong.

Luther, LG, dumblepurplepussboy, etc... can look at rioting, looting, burning, assault on old folks and murder...actions completely by Liberal Dimwits...in cities with Dim mayors, Dim police chiefs, Dim city councils, Dim DAs, and also in states with Dim governors..ALL OF THEM..Minneapolis, ATL, Seattle, Portland, Chicago, NYC...EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM IS ENTIRELY RUN BY DIMWITS AT THE STATE AND LOCAL LEVEL.....

and they blame a Republican President who has absolutely NOTHING to do with day to day life in those cities. Nothing. Every. Single. One. Has been run by Dimwits for DECADES or more.

If you're that f#%king stupid, intellectually dishonest, and detached from reality...I am not going to waste my time arguing with you.

You are a moron. Period. You should be laughed at, and never listened to by rational adults until you manage to reconnect with reality ...if that ever happens. Your progressive liberal ideology has failed. Just like Communism. Failed miserably. The liberal run big cities are ALL sheitholes...because of your leadership...and have terrible crime, education, and poverty.

But it's all the guys fault who has been in DC for 3 years. Ridiculous. We are laughing AT you. Not with you.
 
I honestly think Luther is a decent guy, I think he's skewed by his political prejudices like most of us are. I'm trying to appeal to the logical, which as a member of the teaching community I'm sure he values at some level. He's not a bad dude, I believe he knows that some of the foundation his political beliefs are built on are compromised. That's not a very comfortable feeling, I've been there.
Oh, I agree. I don't think luther is a bad guy. But luther's "logic" has been corrupted by his political prejudice. And unfortunately, he's unable to see that or acknowledge it. It gets pointed out, time and again, and he simply deflects with "continuums" and "degrees". Which is frustrating. But I agree with you, above all that, luther is a good guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and KB5252
Oh, I agree. I don't think luther is a bad guy. But luther's "logic" has been corrupted by his political prejudice. And unfortunately, he's unable to see that or acknowledge it. It gets pointed out, time and again, and he simply deflects with "continuums" and "degrees". Which is frustrating. But I agree with you, above all that, luther is a good guy.
When the failure of luther "logic" and willful ignorance gets clearly pointed out to him, instead of a "my bad", he deflects, repeats his absurdness, looks desperately for some support, and if, by chance, he finds a sliver of one in some post, clings to it like a life preserver then declares "thread over."

He's a despicable human being.
 
I honestly think Luther is a decent guy, I think he's skewed by his political prejudices like most of us are. I'm trying to appeal to the logical, which as a member of the teaching community I'm sure he values at some level. He's not a bad dude, I believe he knows that some of the foundation his political beliefs are built on are compromised. That's not a very comfortable feeling, I've been there.
He is an emotional thinker, like most left wingers. Things get bad when you replace logic with emotion.
 
What's next, the Chiefs and the Braves?
Yep..... and the NBA Washington Wizards will be changing the franchise name for the second time as The original name “Bullets” was too offensive.
I thought they had the best name in the league and best unis before they pussed out.
There are a lot of teams that will be experiencing this poonification
 
I honestly think Luther is a decent guy, I think he's skewed by his political prejudices like most of us are. I'm trying to appeal to the logical, which as a member of the teaching community I'm sure he values at some level. He's not a bad dude, I believe he knows that some of the foundation his political beliefs are built on are compromised. That's not a very comfortable feeling, I've been there.
He doesn’t have a clue..... he lives in denial every day
 
Yep..... and the NBA Washington Wizards will be changing the franchise name for the second time as The original name “Bullets” was too offensive.
I thought they had the best name in the league and best unis before they pussed out.
There are a lot of teams that will be experiencing this poonification
I think the original team was the Baltimore Bullets.

edit this is like the 7th name change for that franchise
Washington Wizards - Wikipedia
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
Then you must be less than 25 years old. Not surprised to see you think it's racism.
If you think n word anything is an acceptable and not racist nickname for something then you are dumb as well as racist.
Redskins isn’t an offensive name. It wasn’t referencing actual skin color in its origins
lol. See you are still coming with the worst arguments ever. That is the definition of racist. lmao
 
If you think n word anything is an acceptable and not racist nickname for something then you are dumb as well as racist.

lol. See you are still coming with the worst arguments ever. That is the definition of racist. lmao
hey you are back after your self-imposed ban of embarrassment after your boy Bubba was proved to not be a victim of a hate crime...we were right again!

and no, the term Redskins came about because native americans used red clay to paint their faces during battle/chants, thus were called such...try again
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
If you think n word anything is an acceptable and not racist nickname for something then you are dumb as well as racist.

lol. See you are still coming with the worst arguments ever. That is the definition of racist. lmao
Do you look at ANYTHING and not see racism? I mean really, is there ANYTHING in this country that you look at other than your reflection in a mirror and not see racism? That nickname has been around FOREVER. The fact that you never heard it is indicative of your age PLUS the fact that people simply don't use that term as much anymore because it is offensive. But that's only if you have the wrong skin tone. If your skin tone is correct, it's never racist.
 

VN Store



Back
Top