C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 27,450
- Likes
- 48,778
The argument in the article is basically that WMT should eat the losses because they make money at other stores so they can afford to lose in these areas. I think it's interesting for someone to claim this is apartheid while also expecting the racists to provide them subsidized food. If white people won't feed you, create your own grocery and then you don't have to worry about the man anymore.
For the record WMT doesn't gaf what color you are. You don't earn half a trillion in revenue by being elitist. They will take anyone's money and as long as a store is making its numbers it will stay open forever.
They pull similar s**t with “affordable housing”. A subdivision with $500k homes “has” to have a few homes that take $300 rent vouchers.