The best and worst schedules in women's college basketball

#26
#26
I love how you're including equally disappointed "Fans" in your argument, yet you seem to be the only one bitching and whining incessantly about this schedule.

By all means show me this "incessant whining." Must be with the "complete ripping" of the schedule.

Like some others - and whether you believe there were others, I don't really care - I made comments about the schedule when it was first announced. And like everyone else, I moved on and haven't said a peep since. I only responded here because I was called out by name...
 
#27
#27
My only stance on this is

A. Texas ended our long standing contract
B. Uconn tried to renew but the SEC wouldn’t move conference games in Jan to accommodate (it’s coming back next szn)
C. Stanford ended our long standing contract on our home game year as well
D. Notre Lame ended our long standing contract after losing so much and is only playing us bc of the challenge (thank u ACC/SEC)

Not all on Kellie when they won’t play u and she wanted to


I dont disagree this is historically easier but as u said most of these top teams don’t want to play they want easy

Fair point, but I have trouble believing Kellie is losing much sleep about dropping two "rivals" that have completely dominated her...
 
#28
#28
Let's try this again:

1, On paper, this one of the weakest schedules Tennessee (a program historically known for playing the most challenging schedule possible) has ever had.

2. Looking at the new NCAA tournament seeding process, and LSU's success, weaker schedules are now the trend in college basketball which still leaves Tennessee with a relatively strong schedule compared to the rest of the nation.

Both of these statements can be true! And fans (not just me) have the right to be disappointed...

The right to be disappointed about what? Those who only live in the past will be destined to be disappointed, because the past was never as good as you remember it. Tennessee always played some of the top teams in the country. They also played a lot of mediocre teams like Depaul, Louisiana Tech, Old Dominion, etc. long after those programs were competitive. They were long-standing rivals so people didn’t mind it, but Tennessee never got anything truly competitive out of any of those games after the mid-90s.

Second, Tennessee used to be able to get teams to come and play here because they had a TV contract with regional cable companies that guaranteed every game would be televised, at a time where most programs, even those in power conferences, were only guaranteed to be on television two or three times a year. Now, every game is available on TV or streaming, Good teams don’t need to come here to get on TV.

Third, you can say you’re disappointed, but what exactly is Tennessee supposed to do? Stanford canceled a scheduled game with us, and with a couple of other programs as well. UConn would only play on one of two dates, neither of which the SEC schedule could accommodate. Most major programs are only allowed to make two flights outside of conference play. It’s unfortunate, and it shouldn’t happen, but it’s a financial reality in college sports right now. So those programs are picking their spots carefully. The fact that Tennessee has the quality games that it does at home is a testament to still trying to hold on to the old anyone, anywhere mentality at a time that most programs don’t embrace it.

Finally, Tennessee is probably going to play in a multi team event every November going forward because that’s the best way to get quality opponents on the schedule. Last year, it was the Battle for Atlantis and some really good teams down there. This year, it’s Indiana and Oklahoma down in Florida. It would be a lot more fun to have those games home and away, but if you were a team like one of those two that can only make one or two flights a year, they are going to do it to an MTE to get two good games instead of just one.

But to continue to bang the drum of being disappointed, or to continue to be critical of Tennessee for it, is just living in the past and not accepting the reality of college sports. This isn’t the 1990s where only five or six teams care about women’s basketball and all five or six of them are on the schedule every year. When Pat was scheduling like she was, there might only be one team in the SEC that was a legitimate threat. Now there are four or five in a given year. That’s a factor as well.
 
#29
#29
The right to be disappointed about what? Those who only live in the past will be destined to be disappointed, because the past was never as good as you remember it. Tennessee always played some of the top teams in the country. They also played a lot of mediocre teams like Depaul, Louisiana Tech, Old Dominion, etc. long after those programs were competitive. They were long-standing rivals so people didn’t mind it, but Tennessee never got anything truly competitive out of any of those games after the mid-90s.

Second, Tennessee used to be able to get teams to come and play here because they had a TV contract with regional cable companies that guaranteed every game would be televised, at a time where most programs, even those in power conferences, were only guaranteed to be on television two or three times a year. Now, every game is available on TV or streaming, Good teams don’t need to come here to get on TV.

Third, you can say you’re disappointed, but what exactly is Tennessee supposed to do? Stanford canceled a scheduled game with us, and with a couple of other programs as well. UConn would only play on one of two dates, neither of which the SEC schedule could accommodate. Most major programs are only allowed to make two flights outside of conference play. It’s unfortunate, and it shouldn’t happen, but it’s a financial reality in college sports right now. So those programs are picking their spots carefully. The fact that Tennessee has the quality games that it does at home is a testament to still trying to hold on to the old anyone, anywhere mentality at a time that most programs don’t embrace it.

Finally, Tennessee is probably going to play in a multi team event every November going forward because that’s the best way to get quality opponents on the schedule. Last year, it was the Battle for Atlantis and some really good teams down there. This year, it’s Indiana and Oklahoma down in Florida. It would be a lot more fun to have those games home and away, but if you were a team like one of those two that can only make one or two flights a year, they are going to do it to an MTE to get two good games instead of just one.

But to continue to bang the drum of being disappointed, or to continue to be critical of Tennessee for it, is just living in the past and not accepting the reality of college sports. This isn’t the 1990s where only five or six teams care about women’s basketball and all five or six of them are on the schedule every year. When Pat was scheduling like she was, there might only be one team in the SEC that was a legitimate threat. Now there are four or five in a given year. That’s a factor as well.

Literally no one:

DeerPark12: WHY IS EVERYONE RIPPING TENNESSEE'S SCHEDULE??????
 
#32
#32
Literally no one:

DeerPark12: WHY IS EVERYONE RIPPING TENNESSEE'S SCHEDULE??????

As Chuckiepoo said earlier, your trolling has really declined of late. DeerPark was specifically responding to your dead horse posts on the LV's schedule.

But, addressing you directly is a pointless mistake that no one should ever make. Oh [expletive deleted]...
 
#33
#33
As Chuckiepoo said earlier, your trolling has really declined of late. DeerPark was specifically responding to your dead horse posts on the LV's schedule.

But, addressing you directly is a pointless mistake that no one should ever make. Oh [expletive deleted]...
I was going to go through and quote all of his posts that I was referring to, but I just kind of lost interest.
 
#35
#35
I was going to go through and quote all of his posts that I was referring to, but I just kind of lost interest.

In other words, you couldn't find anything after the schedule came out because no one (including me) has said a damn thing about it since - until YOU brought it up again...
 
#39
#39
The SEC is ESPN’s cash cow and they know it.
It's Top Ten by Anybody's Standards.

Here:s Massey:

TeamRecordΔRatPwrOffDefHFASoSSSFEWEL
CorrelationNaN89990085680760NaN1000526-415
South Carolina
Southeastern
0-0
0.000
1
9.46
1
74.74
4
101.85
1
37.70
2.641
0.00
1
56.87
25.783.22
UCLA
Pac 12
0-0
0.000
-220
8.56
20
62.55
28
96.11
15
31.25
2.621
0.00
2
56.68
18.8610.14
Notre Dame
Atlantic Coast
0-0
0.000
13
8.66
13
64.15
20
97.70
14
31.26
2.701
0.00
3
56.31
20.268.74
Maryland
Big 10
0-0
0.000
6
8.80
6
66.05
3
103.13
40
27.74
2.701
0.00
4
56.26
21.577.43
Iowa
Big 10
0-0
0.000
4
8.83
4
66.54
1
106.75
78
24.60
2.571
0.00
5
56.13
21.266.74
Colorado
Pac 12
0-0
0.000
23
8.50
23
61.90
35
95.26
11
31.45
2.681
0.00
6
56.03
18.9010.10
Tennessee
Southeastern
0-0
0.000
10
8.72
9
64.86
10
100.08
26
29.60
2.711
0.00
7
56.00
19.938.07
NC State
Atlantic Coast
0-0
0.000
8
8.75
7
65.42
14
98.95
13
31.28
2.691
0.00
8
55.73
22.377.63
Ohio St
Big 10
0-0
0.000
15
8.60
15
63.30
5
101.47
53
26.64
2.671
0.00
9
55.70
20.188.82
North Carolina
Atlantic Coast
0-0
0.000
16
8.58
17
62.90
30
96.10
10
31.62
2.741
0.00
10
55.66
18.979.03
Connecticut
Big East
0-0
0.000
3
9.04
3
69.22
8
100.57
4
33.46
2.671
0.00
11
55.51
25.235.77
 
#40
#40
The schedule is not bad in today's game and you're going to lose comparing to past a schedules. Coaches at all Universities are more worried about winning 20 games and keeping their jobs than how many tough teams they put on their schedules. The only way to tell if a schedule is tough is at the end of the year not at the beginning. Also the SEC is no longer the bell cow of Women's Basketball.
 

VN Store



Back
Top