Look at the number of times in the last ten years that a conference has had multiple teams in the Final Four. Then, realize that the Big East this year is better than all of those leagues.Hat, do you think the Big East is going to have three teams in the FF? Odds of that happening are slim to none. Odds of getting two aren't much better. They're obviously beatable.
There have been two teams from the same conference in 8 of the last 10 Final Fours.
You're acting as if Pitt, UCONN, and Louisville are the only Big East teams that can make the Final Four.How many times have 3 #1 seeds made it to the Final Four? (2 times) How many times have 4 #1 seeds made it? (once). My point being: IF the BE has three #1 seeds it is unlikely that all of them make it BECAUSE they are #1 seeds. Not knocking the BE just saying that sometimes its harder for all those #1 to actually get there. I'll be shocked if they get more than two.
It was Huggins. He talking about the prospect of having to beat Pitt, UCONN, and Louisville on consecutive nights to win the Big East.I can't remember who they credited the quote to (Huggins I believe), but one of the coaches last night said that it'd be more difficult to make a run through and win the Big East tournament than it would be to make it to the Final Four.
I don't think I can argue it either.