Getting to the Final Four in '86 with the limited roster he had is one of the most impressive accomplishments in tournament coaching history. Brown gets way too much heat for not going deeper into the tournament with the Chris Jackson-Shaq-Stanley Roberts team. They were only together for one year, almost all the players in the rotation were freshmen and sophomores, and the Georgia Tech team that beat them in Knoxville was really, really good.Dale Brown is generally thought to be an outstanding coach.
Getting big heat for losing against good teams in a one and done tournament is senseless. Best of 7 style losses with the best team is a different animal. Repeated early outs is also a different animal.Getting to the Final Four in '86 with the limited roster he had is one of the most impressive accomplishments in tournament coaching history. Brown gets way too much heat for not going deeper into the tournament with the Chris Jackson-Shaq-Stanley Roberts team. They were only together for one year, almost all the players in the rotation were freshmen and sophomores, and the Georgia Tech team that beat them in Knoxville was really, really good.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
In general, I agree. However, some guys are the victims of their own success in that respect. Gene Keady's teams almost always vastly overperformed in the regular season. Then, they would get seeded much higher than their talent warranted and people would rip them when they got beat. That's not fair.Repeated early outs is also a different animal.
Getting to the Final Four in '86 with the limited roster he had is one of the most impressive accomplishments in tournament coaching history. Brown gets way too much heat for not going deeper into the tournament with the Chris Jackson-Shaq-Stanley Roberts team. They were only together for one year, almost all the players in the rotation were freshmen and sophomores, and the Georgia Tech team that beat them in Knoxville was really, really good.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
In general, I agree. However, some guys are the victims of their own success in that respect. Gene Keady's teams almost always vastly overperformed in the regular season. Then, they would get seeded much higher than their talent warranted and people would rip them when they got beat. That's not fair.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
damn right. We were lucky as hell to draw a guard-centric team that needed the 3 as badly as we did.I would certainly agree that was the case Pearl's first season. His second year, they performed exactly as they should have with the draw they had. They were better than Virginia.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I would certainly agree that was the case Pearl's first season. His second year, they performed exactly as they should have with the draw they had. They were better than Virginia.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I meant last year and year 1, actually. Up until this year (which is funny, really) we haven't had the 'talent' for a 2 seeded team, yet we've gotten two of them.
I still don't like the fact that in 6 postseason tournaments (SEC and NCAA), UT under Pearl has yet to outplay it's seed. Hell, we've only played up to our seeding in one out of the six (2007 NCAAs). I am hoping that maybe for once we'll underachieve in the regular season and overachieve in tourney time.
Tennessee didn't overperform last year. Their year went pretty much as it should have. Louisville, despite the vast majority of this board trying to tell me different all season, was flat better.I meant last year and year 1, actually. Up until this year (which is funny, really) we haven't had the 'talent' for a 2 seeded team, yet we've gotten two of them.
Did Lefty Driesell ever make a Final Four?
- Had some big success at the mid-major level prior to taking the gig at Maryland.
- Had a lot of bravado and was a big promoter for hoops at Maryland.
- Had some star-studded teams
- Regularly made the tournament
- Also had some serious disciplinary and academic problems with some of his players that led to his fallout at Maryland.
Hell, I don't know. I'm reaching.
If so, that would mean we get a NC, right?