The Everything Fantasy Football Thread

#1,906
#1,906
TrueOrange said:
Anyone think Sanchez (v WAS) should be started over Stafford (v CHI)?


(Would just like some second opinions.)
Click to expand...

TrueOrange said:
My concern's mainly been Stafford's consistency (I knew the MIN game numbers were coming from a mile away after how he did the first time against them).


Thoughts on Jordan Matthews this week?
Click to expand...
Sanchez is much more inconsistent. I'd go Stafford and it's not even close.

Matthews has a good matchup, just a matter of getting targeted. I wouldn't want to start him unless I had to.

WarDamnVols said:
Jordan Matthews vs Skins or Steve Smith vs Houston?
Click to expand...
I probably end up going with Smith.
 
#1,909
#1,909
Wish Maclin had been held to 10-20 less yards, but otherwise I'm good so far (unless Matthews's 5.8 turns out to be the highest my WRs put up lol).



Stick with a now healthy Julius Thomas (v CIN)? High potential, as always, and a high floor...but their passing game output has clearly gone down the last few weeks (more of a focus on running). Other options would probably be the Colts TEs...Fleener or Dwayne Allen (vs DAL).
 
Last edited:
#1,912
#1,912
Alright, here's my biggest issue:

My RBs are D. Murray (v. IND), C.J. Anderson (v. CIN), and M. Ingram (v ATL). Ingram plays at noon, Murray at 4:30, C.J. at 7:30. Clearly, everything with Murray's surgery has been the biggest concern...but he is expected to play (they're concerned about pass protection, though).



So I have two options b/c of game-start times:

1) Start Ingram, and then Murray/Anderson.

2) Start Murray and Anderson, and hope Murray plays (and does so well), and if he doesn't right before the game pick up Randle.


Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
#1,913
#1,913
I'm guessing all these questions are starting to be a bother (the TE one was silly, sorry), so I'll stop after this:

Starting Odell so need 2 more: LaFell (v NYJ...Edelman and Blount also not playing now), Stills (v ATL), Colston (v ATL), Moncrief (v DAL...but Hilton likely not playing), Johnson (v. BAL, put Keenum pretty much threw just to him previously), or Steve Smith (v HOU)

Barth v Crosby (Most of those FGs last week were because OAK kept stopping DEN...especially near the goal line, and GB playing TB might mean another high-scoring one-sided game?)
 
#1,918
#1,918
TrueOrange said:
Alright, here's my biggest issue:

My RBs are D. Murray (v. IND), C.J. Anderson (v. CIN), and M. Ingram (v ATL). Ingram plays at noon, Murray at 4:30, C.J. at 7:30. Clearly, everything with Murray's surgery has been the biggest concern...but he is expected to play (they're concerned about pass protection, though).



So I have two options b/c of game-start times:

1) Start Ingram, and then Murray/Anderson.

2) Start Murray and Anderson, and hope Murray plays (and does so well), and if he doesn't right before the game pick up Randle.


Thoughts?
Click to expand...
I know it's a little late now, but I probably would have gone with Ingram and Anderson. There is no guarantee that Murray will be even be able to play the whole game and his touches will be limited from what I'v read.

TrueOrange said:
Bailey or Murray...if you can get him, Moncrief would also be an option with Hilton out.
Click to expand...
Moncrief isn't available. I came to the Bailely or Murray conclusion too. Leaning towards Murray because he's guaranteed to get touches and goal line opportunities. I'm sure whichever one I bench will have the better game. :crazy:

TrueOrange said:
Best of luck to anyone playing in a final today!
Click to expand...
I'm going nuts watching FantasyCast lol. Dolphins D might be my backbreaker. I can't believe I may regret starting them over the Jags D. Rodgers needs to pick it up!
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top