The Dude
Abides.
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2007
- Messages
- 7,263
- Likes
- 8
I will play your game. If the intel turned out to be correct, yet Bush never made it public (as he has no requirement to, since it is intel concerning national security) and Iraq armed operatives to attack a US city with a weapon of mass destruction, then what would you be saying today? You would most likely be blaming Bush for a lack of action. I would rather our Commander-in-Chief place trust in the intelligence community (our own, which was corroborated by every major player on the globe, save China) and act then sit idly by thinking, "Well, it might be wrong..."
CIA chief George Tenet clearly stated in Oct '02 that Saddam was not likely in the near future to hit the United States or share his weapons with al Qaeda or other anti-American terrorists, unless the United States attacked Iraq first. Bush parlayed that into saying that an attack from Hussen was inevitable. Additionally, Tenet's evidence that al Qaeda was in Iraq was vague at best.