Love getting all these replies, but so many of you don't make enough sense on which to base a response so I'll just do a group one.
Can you guys explain something, if the Dems are so crooked, how come you guys can't convict them or prove anything? A lot of republicans are going to jail though. Supposedly we stole the election, but you can't prove it.
And you guys never want to respond to those factual references proving your error, for instance, no one replied on the evisceration of the IRS "whistleblower" by the DOJ attorney. You had made so much of his testimony and now, crickets.
And no one seems to want to defend the buffoon, Comer, and his "lost" witnesses.
Also love the way you guys say that the President is responsible for the crimes of his son, which btw were misdemeanors. Is that a standard we can apply across the board now? Might bring up some interesting issues with other politicians. Oh yeah, and while you say he was protected by the President, that doesn't made sense since the attorney in charge was appointed while Trump was President and says he was never pressured. But don't let facts get in your way.
For all of you who love to cite the laptop, it couldn't be used as evidence because of the chain of custody rule (I am told you have to be able to show continual custody by reliable authority, not people who would have an interest in altering the contents of the computer). But you guys hate following the rules so I'm sure it doesn't matter to you.
All in all, you guys throw the word corruption around but you never have any proof.