The Hunter Biden Thread

[evillawyer]

Has Hunter resigned/been removed from .... Wait, what government position does he hold again?

 

[Vol8188]

Has Hunter resigned/been removed from .... Wait, what government position does he hold again?

The question is less about him and more about his dad. We have emails saying he is to hold x% of a deal for the “big guy” and Hunter himself said “my dad is right here” while threatening/extorting a Chinese business. Seems we should look into this and see if Joe was involved or if his son was simply lying. Both are possible, right?

 

[Majors]

That's not true. Read those articles.

So she didnt start her business of jewelry in 2007 and she didn’t have celebraties such as Jenifer Lopez wearing it? That’s what you’re saying, don’t need to read articles…it’s a yes/no question.

 

[DC_Vol]

Has Hunter resigned/been removed from .... Wait, what government position does he hold again?

He’s the bagman. Paid under the table, if you know what I mean.

Also an artist that commands very high prices for his paintings.

 

[BowlBrother85]

I assumed you didn’t need a link for something so well known. Are you saying you didn’t know Hunter sent a text to a Chinese business man threatening him and invoking Joe Biden’s name if he didn’t send Hunter money? And that Hunter’s attorney has confirmed the text messages are real and from Hunter?

Your “sources” are speculation. This is actual evidence of known extortion

It's not speculation that after Trump was elected in 2016, China fast-tracked 18 trademarks for Ivanka Trump, which they had already denied. These trademarks were approved even though her business was not performing well.

It's not speculation that Trump lifted the ban on ZTE, even though they had violated sanctions against selling equipment to Iran and North Korea. That's outrageous ... and from someone who claimed to be tough on China.

Those are facts.

 

[Wireless1]

Pffft .... It was obviously Joe's stash. Quit trolling.

If it was Joe’s there’d be a lot fewer gaffes and he’s be flying up those AF1 steps instead of stumbling up them

 

[whodeycin85]

It's not speculation that after Trump was elected in 2016, China fast-tracked 18 trademarks for Ivanka Trump, which they had already denied. These trademarks were approved even though her business was not performing well.

It's not speculation that Trump lifted the ban on ZTE, even though they had violated sanctions against selling equipment to Iran and North Korea. That's outrageous ... and from someone who claimed to be tough on China.

Those are facts.

You assume they are related without proof.

 

[hUTch2002]

That is bull $hit.

@Weezer certainly does ... while drawing false equivalencies.

To be fair, Weezer didn’t have a whataboutism meltdown a few years back and then turn right back to using whataboutism. That was epic!

 

[Vol8188]

It's not speculation that after Trump was elected in 2016, China fast-tracked 18 trademarks for Ivanka Trump, which they had already denied. These trademarks were approved even though her business was not performing well.

It's not speculation that Trump lifted the ban on ZTE, even though they had violated sanctions against selling equipment to Iran and North Korea. That's outrageous ... and from someone who claimed to be tough on China.

Those are facts.

The speculation is that something inappropriate occurred in her obtaining those trademarks. That’s speculation.

It’s speculation that trump lifted that ban for an inappropriate reason (I assume that’s what you’re saying, if not, it’s not relevant).

The Hunter Biden text messages go beyond speculation of impropriety. He’s very openly extorting a Chinese business. You have no such evidence of extortion or money exchanges in the above examples you’ve provided. Yet you’re trying to pretend they’re the same

 

[BowlBrother85]

So she didnt start her business of jewelry in 2007 and she didn’t have celebraties such as Jenifer Lopez wearing it? That’s what you’re saying, don’t need to read articles…it’s a yes/no question.

It's not a yes/no question because your premise is absurd.

Are you suggesting that having celebrity endorsers is a sign of a company being legitimately successful?

Star power? Growing list of celeb endorsers showing up in crypto/NFT lawsuits

If so ... FTX investors say hello.

This is an abbreviated list of the sports and entertainment celebrities who endorsed FTX :

Tom Brady
Gisele Bundchen
Madonna
Larry David
Steph Curry
Shaquille O'Neal
Kevin Hart
Gwyneth Paltrow
Justin Bieber
Paris Hilton
Jimmy Fallon
Serena Williams

 

[C-south]

Pffft .... It was obviously Joe's stash. Quit trolling.

He is a strong sniffer.

 

[Majors]

It's not a yes/no question because your premise is absurd.

Are you suggesting that having celebrity endorsers is a sign of a company being legitimately successful?

Star power? Growing list of celeb endorsers showing up in crypto/NFT lawsuits

If so ... FTX investors say hello.

This is an abbreviated list of the sports and entertainment celebrities who endorsed FTX :

Tom Brady
Gisele Bundchen
Madonna
Larry David
Steph Curry
Shaquille O'Neal
Kevin Hart
Gwyneth Paltrow
Justin Bieber
Paris Hilton
Jimmy Fallon
Serena Williams

Absurd is the side bar into FTX…not sure we need to circle back to how the Biden’s are connected here. With the sizeable and questionable donation to Biden’s campaign.

Should have just said, yes when I gave you the two options. Instead you went on a meaningless tangent that went back to the corruption of the WH and FTX.

 

[Vol8188]

Pffft .... It was obviously Joe's stash. Quit trolling.

He doesn’t have the lung capacity to snort things. He’s barely able to suck in oxygen at this point.

 

[85SugarVol]

Your question mandated either an agreement ... or a disagreement, which would require an example. That's not what-about-ism.

Yea, you said “well, what about Weezer!”
If you don’t think that’s a what about, well ok then.

You had 2 what abouts in a single post up there defending Hunter. That was impressive to see.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Absurd is the side bar into FTX…not sure we need to circle back to how the Biden’s are connected here. With the sizeable and questionable donation to Biden’s campaign.

Should have just said, yes when I gave you the two options. Instead you went on a meaningless tangent that went back to the corruption of the WH and FTX.

You seemed to be suggesting that a company having celebrity endorsers was a sign of success? FTX is not a side bar. It's an example of how the premise of your question was ridiculous.

 

[BowlBrother85]

That is bull $hit.

@Weezer certainly does ... while drawing false equivalencies.

@85SugarVol ... I did not say "Well, what about Weezer?" .... ^^^^ I said what was posted up above. ^^^^

 

[85SugarVol]

To be fair, Weezer didn’t have a whataboutism meltdown a few years back and then turn right back to using whataboutism. That was epic!

He admitted how often he throws them out (which is frequently).

Guess he doesn’t remember that.

 

[85SugarVol]

@85SugarVol ... I did not say "What about Weezer?" ^^^^ I said what was posted up above. ^^^^

Are you serious right now?

Me - you throw out what abouts
You - That’s BS. Weezer does that.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Are you serious right now?

Me - you throw out what abouts
You - That’s BS. Weezer does that.

Yes, I'm serious. I was disagreeing with you, and providing an example of why. That's not whataboutism.

 

[Majors]

You seemed to be suggesting that a company having celebrity endorsers was a sign of success? FTX is not a side bar. It's an example of how the premise of your question was ridiculous.

Ridiculous was your timeline, it somehow skipped a decade of accolades. The Lopez reference was to show the brand was just fine and thriving. You’re speaking of a Ponzi scheme.

 

[85SugarVol]

Yes, I'm serious. I was disagreeing with you, and providing an example of why. That's not whataboutism.

Lol. Whatever you need to tell yourself.

When you are confronted with allegations about Hunter, and immediately pivot to Ivanka & Neil Bush?

Is that “disagreeing and providing examples”too? Or is that true what about?

 

[BowlBrother85]

Ridiculous was your timeline, it somehow skipped a decade of accolades. The Lopez reference was to show the brand was just fine and thriving. You’re speaking of a Ponzi scheme.

Granted, things got much worse for her fashion business after her dad announced he was running for President, because her brand became politicized, but her fashion business was never "thriving," as the Business Insider article pointed out. The Business Insider article covered everything from the time the business was founded, until it shut down.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Lol. Whatever you need to tell yourself.

When you are confronted with allegations about Hunter, and immediately pivot to Ivanka & Neil Bush?

Is that “disagreeing and providing examples”too? Or is that true what about?

You are changing the subject away from what I said was not a whataboutism .... and it wasn't.

 

[Majors]

Granted, things got much worse for her fashion business after her dad announced he was running for President, because her brand became politicized, but her fashion business was never "thriving," as the Business Insider article pointed out.

You mean boycotted because how media manipulation played out. Never in question when Trump was giving money to the left.

 

[Vol8188]

That is bull $hit.

@Weezer certainly does ... while drawing false equivalencies.

So when confronted with an accusation of using too many “what about isms” you respond by saying “what about that guy!”

This is impressive level trolling. Props to you