The Hunter Biden Thread

Trump Says he’d be Open to Pardoning Hunter Biden: ‘I wouldn’t take it off the books’​


Former President Donald Trump said he wouldn’t rule out pardoning first son Hunter Biden.

The 45th president had previously not disclosed whether he would pardon President Biden’s son, but dished to Hugh Hewitt in an interview Thursday that he wouldn’t be fully opposed to the idea.

“See, unlike Joe Biden, despite what they’ve done to me, where they’ve gone after me so viciously, despite what — and Hunter’s a bad boy. There’s no question about it. He’s been a bad boy. All you had to do is see the laptop from hell. But I happen to think it’s very bad for our country,” Trump said.


That is a genius move politically, especially on a week in which the left is basically accusing him of planning to round up and jail everyone on the left.
 
That is a genius move politically, especially on a week in which the left is basically accusing him of planning to round up and jail everyone on the left.
If La Don Don Hitler came out and said tomorrow that he does in fact intend to pardon Hunter Biden - the heads at CNN would absolutely explode lol.
 
Joe Biden has nothing to lose by pardoning him of all federal convictions. Wanna try to bring charges of some sort against Joe? Good luck, since former Presidents are considered immune now.
Immune? If Trump wins, he can weaponize his DOJ and make Bidens life a living hell, too.

All that aside, and all the stuff on Hunters laptop aside, what was Hunter thinking screwing his dead brothers underage daughter?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
What does that have to do with anything? If Trump wins, he can go after Biden with his weaponized DOJ and move the case to the most red city, most red judges, most red jurors, and unleash lawfare as well.

That was a stupid question. It has a lot to do with what you are suggesting.

.... and not if the underlying crime relates to a core or exclusive presidential power, and only if the alleged criminal act is manifestly outside of the perimeter of being an official executive action.

As for everything else? Good luck with that. LOL.

Sounds like a productive strategy for how to govern, and it would do wonders for the Republican Party in the 2026 mid-term elections .... where their losses will likely be just as substantial as they were in the 2018 mid-terms, anyway.
 
Last edited:
What does that have to do with anything? If Trump wins, he can go after Biden with his weaponized DOJ and move the case to the most red city, most red judges, most red jurors, and unleash lawfare as well.

Trump won't go after anyone, he didn't go after Hillary and they had enough to bury her.

Most he might do is clean house within the DOJ/FBI.
 

That was a stupid question. It has a lot to do with what you are suggesting.

.... and not if the underlying crime relates to a core or exclusive presidential power, and only if the alleged criminal act is manifestly outside of the perimeter of being an official executive action.

As for everything else? Good luck with that. LOL.

Sounds like a productive strategy for how to govern, and it would do wonders for the Republican Party in the 2026 mid-term elections .... where their losses will likely be just as substantial as they were in the 2018 mid-terms, anyway.
Not a stupid question. My comment of what he can do if he wins, is exactly what Biden and his DOJ did the last four years.
 
That’s not what the ruling said

Yeah. I am not sure why the nutjobs keep saying the same thing over and over.

I assume Dementia Joe pardons Hunter before his term is up but he is taking the chance he doesn't keel over. Dementia Joe has the murders on his hands but has cover due to DOJ saying he is not mentality fit, but that doesn't mean he couldn't be detained to pending his ability to assist in his own defense. Obama and Hillary have no real cover.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85

VN Store



Back
Top