The Impeachment Thread

[zeppelin128]

Great...here comes the campaign speech.

I'll refrain since we are in the Trump impeachment thread.

 

[zeppelin128]

They might as well.........they've owned us for years and years.
Game will be ugly for UT. It's really sad we can't have a team that's competitive.

It is actually a pretty evenly matched series. 23-23-2.

I mean, we will get curb stomped this weekend. But it has been very back and forth over the years.

 

[Grand Vol]

“I don’t know how much speculation we need...” [proceeds with pure speculation.]

Why do you just bring back the “Biden confessed” narrative?

It may very well be speculation about the "help" given to them, but it's probably far more likely than you care to admit. As for Pelosi and Schiff, they both admitted to it.

What else was speculation? And furthermore, where did I invoke Biden anywhere? Don't try to put words down I didn't use.

 

[Fun coupon VOL]

 

[BigOrangeD]

 

[zeppelin128]

GOOD ...We all need to laugh now and then to keep us sane . Laughter is good for the soul .

I just want to know how you know I've got all these voodoo dolls of Biden, Warren, Bernie, and Kamala lying around? Were you at the market the other day when I bought those chicken feet?

 

[golfballs]

Nah...

Red-state Democrats worry impeachment may spin out of control

 

[RockyTop85]

It may very well be speculation about the "help" given to them, but it's probably far more likely than you care to admit. As for Pelosi and Schiff, they both admitted to it.

What else was speculation? And furthermore, where did I invoke Biden anywhere? Don't try to put words down I didn't use.

Typo. Should have been “why don’t you just bring back...”

When did Pelosi admit she saw the complaint? I’ve seen some people making that inference from something she said, but it wasn’t actually what she said. That’s where the Biden reference came from. It was the same “two truths and a lie” song and dance that went on with the Biden confessed thing.

 

[Grand Vol]

"In advance" of what? Him filing it? Or them announcing impeachment.

Nothing wrong with the latter. And really nothing wrong with the former if the contents are true, which so far they have proven to be, given Trump's admission and the transcript.

Advance of Congress seeing it. You said (or someone did and you probably cheered them on) that Pelosi likely knew more than she had been given when she announced the impeachment process. You don't find it most curious she hadn't seen the complaint or the transcript and already made up her mind to push forward with the impeachment process?

Who told Pelosi? How did Schiff know the particulars? This whole thing is a setup from the get-go. You and I both know it yet you won't admit it.

 

[BigOrangeD]

 

[zeppelin128]

There is nothing classy about those racist race baiters.

You left out Kenyan Muslim. You are slipping, C.

 

[BigOrangeD]

Pot calling Kettle Black.

 

[Velo Vol]

I'm trying to come up with an analogy of what's been happening.

Imagine a warehouse fire breaks out at night. A passerby calls the fire department to come put it out.

The next morning the town alternative newspaper begins printing a series of stories on the incident. But not about the fire itself-- about the passerby.

• What about this passerby? Was he authorized to use the phone he made the call on?
• Did the passerby actually see flames when he called? Or did he only smell smoke?
• Did the passerby make the call himself? Or did someone else dial the number?
• Did the passerby call 911? Or did he try to call the fire station first?

Anything but discuss, you know, the damage the fire actually did. It's really bizarre.

 

[BigOrangeD]

 

[lawgator1]

Advance of Congress seeing it. You said (or someone did and you probably cheered them on) that Pelosi likely knew more than she had been given when she announced the impeachment process. You don't find it most curious she hadn't seen the complaint or the transcript and already made up her mind to push forward with the impeachment process?

Who told Pelosi? How did Schiff know the particulars? This whole thing is a setup from the get-go. You and I both know it yet you won't admit it.

I think its a distraction. Let's say you are right and Pelosi and Schiff got a copy 1 to 2 days in advance of announcing impeachment inquiry.

That has no effect on the accuracy of what is contained therein.

 

[BigOrangeD]

 

[Boston Vol]

I’ve been critical of his predilection for twitter, but this is legitimately great.

 

[lawgator1]

There you go. One simply does not follow from the other. Also its Nunes, who has the credibility of a dead turtle.

 

[BigOrangeD]

 

[0nelilreb]

I just want to know how you know I've got all these voodoo dolls of Biden, Warren, Bernie, and Kamala lying around? Were you at the market the other day when I bought those chicken feet?

No I missed the chicken feet but I saw Amazon delivering that Jobu doll you ordered and just assumed you had the dolls .

 

[hUTch2002]

That's a neat trick: Trump emgages in a long patterb of repeated and serious and illegal abuses of power and the Dems are supposed to look the other way because he can call for investigations, too?

Takes whataboutism to a whole new level. But clearly Trump muddying the waters is the plan here.

So question since you are a law expert, with an agreement between Ukraine and USA to investigate criminal activity how is it breaking the law to ask the Ukrainian President to uphold that agreement?

 

[Electric Orange]

Pot calling Kettle Black.

Gross.
Uncalled for posting that witch goblin

 

[Jxn Vol]

I think its a distraction. Let's say you are right and Pelosi and Schiff got a copy 1 to 2 days in advance of announcing impeachment inquiry.

That has no effect on the accuracy of what is contained therein.

They didn’t expect Trump would release the call transcript. There is nothing in there that warrants impeachment. Actually it doesn’t even come close to what the faux whistleblower reported. Check mate.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

It's pretty blatant, although Trump and Rudy aren't exactly known for their subtlety. They think the nominee will be Biden, so the attack dogs are out already. It won't hurt Biden. It might help him actually, depending on how people on the left react to it.

Michael Moore brands Biden as 'this year's Hillary,' says he seems 'afraid' to talk about Ukraine allegations

 

[RockyTop85]

I'm trying to come up with an analogy of what's been happening.

Imagine a warehouse fire breaks out at night. A passerby calls the fire department to come put it out.

The next morning the town alternative newspaper begins printing a series of stories on the incident. But not about the fire itself-- about the passerby.

• What about this passerby? Was he authorized to use the phone he made the call on?
• Did the passerby actually see flames when he called? Or did he only smell smoke?
• Did the passerby make the call himself? Or did someone else dial the number?
• Did the passerby call 911? Or did he try to call the fire station first?

Anything but discuss, you know, the damage the fire actually did. It's really bizarre.

“Your mainstream local paper doesn’t want to talk about these things. All they’re writing about is the damage done by the flames!!”