The Impeachment Thread

#19,701
#19,701
NorthDallas40 said:
How many on the call have come out contesting the content of the WH provided transcript?
Click to expand...
Only the ones who aren't true Scotsmen evidently.
It's their only available strategy: keep the ring in the noses of the 36% Trumpublicans and claim anyone who deviates from the Trump line is a Rino, a never-Trumper, a deep stater, etc....
And then hope there are enough spineless senators and congressmen afraid of agitating the 36% that they will toe the line.
 
#19,702
#19,702
luthervol said:
Only the ones who aren't true Scotsmen evidently.
It's their only available strategy: keep the ring in the noses of the 36% Trumpublicans and claim anyone who deviates from the Trump line is a Rino, a never-Trumper, a deep stater, etc....
And then hope there are enough spineless senators and congressmen afraid of agitating the 36% that they will toe the line.
Click to expand...
So true Scotsman is how you quantify the number zero? Ok
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
#19,703
#19,703
luthervol said:
Only the ones who aren't true Scotsmen evidently.
It's their only available strategy: keep the ring in the noses of the 36% Trumpublicans and claim anyone who deviates from the Trump line is a Rino, a never-Trumper, a deep stater, etc....
And then hope there are enough spineless senators and congressmen afraid of agitating the 36% that they will toe the line.
Click to expand...

So you admit dims like grandstanding and wasting time on this charade? You throw out these numbers that undoubtedly mean Trump will be finished in a year. He’s not getting impeached. God forbid dims actually try and get anything worthwhile done.
 
#19,704
#19,704
NorthDallas40 said:
LMAO. She recanted and amnended her statement yesterday. Zelensky brought up Burisma. You’re behind. And I don’t believe you are correct on Vindman either.

Yep I was right. Vindman said it was Zelensky too. Womp womp.

Top national security aide said White House transcript left out direct mention of Burisma and other details from Trump call

And just to add the dunk I’ll finish with this quote from the article.
Click to expand...
Captain obtuse to the rescue.

Here's your question:

"How many on the call have come out contesting the content of the WH provided transcript?"

Two people have said the transcript is not completely accurate because it did not contain mention of burisma, which was referenced by name on the call. That point stands and that answers your question.
 
#19,706
#19,706
evillawyer said:
Captain obtuse to the rescue.

Here's your question:

"How many on the call have come out contesting the content of the WH provided transcript?"

Two people have said the transcript is not completely accurate because it did not contain mention of burisma, which was referenced by name on the call. That point stands and that answers your question.
Click to expand...
LMAO. I knew you were going to come back with your usual catch phrase and word parsing to ignore the point.

Nobody had questioned the accuracy of the content of the WH provided content. Of the two you mentioned neither supported Trump bringing up Burisma as you implied. One did initially and amended their statement. The other said it from the get go.

and being butt hurt that all your edits didn’t make it in /= contesting the accuracy of the transcript.

Keep selling the narrative though girl it’s all you got 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
#19,710
#19,710
NorthDallas40 said:
LMAO. I knew you were going to come back with your usual catch phrase and word parsing to ignore the point.

Nobody had questioned the accuracy of the content of the WH provided content. Of the two you mentioned neither supported Trump bringing up Burisma as you implied. One did initially and amended their statement. The other said it from the get go.

and being butt hurt that all your edits didn’t make it in /= contesting the accuracy of the transcript.

Keep selling the narrative though girl it’s all you got 😂
Click to expand...

Confess, are you an alum of the Derek Zoolander School for Kids Who Can't Read Good?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ty4Vols, luthervol and RockyTop85
#19,711
#19,711
evillawyer said:
Confess, are you an alum of the Derek Zoolander School for Kids Who Can't Read Good?
Click to expand...
LMAO what a horrible sales job girl.

Nobody has questioned the accuracy of the WH transcript as presented. And being butt hurt your edits didn’t get in is not questioning the accuracy. And your swap to the ad homs shows you know it. @RockyTop85 approves too, that’s his goto move when his “substance” falls apart. Rocky I noticed you went mum on the issue after I called you out about five times on the same question last night 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#19,712
#19,712
luthervol said:
It's nowhere near the big deal repubs. tried to create. Trump and company are much worse with the handling of information. And Bush "lost" millions of e-mails with nary a peep from the right wing propaganda machine.
Selective indignation.
Do you presume Hillary is innocent?
Click to expand...
In regards to the existence of an unsecured server in her residence, hell no. You shouldn't either. And it IS a big deal. And I'm not referring to the 'lost' emails. I'm talking about her blatant disregard for comm security as the SecState. It was not naive s she claims.. it was irresponsible at a minimum, it was flaunting her status a being above the law at worst. . We honestly don't know what was compromised. If she had tens of thousands of emails on there, there is no telling how many secure documents were on there.

Keep backing that horse luther. This country will be far better off when she is gone.

As to the Bush's, i have never heard of any controversy. Bring it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#19,713
#19,713
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#19,714
#19,714
SpaceCoastVol said:
As to the Bush's, i have never heard of any controversy. Bring it.
Click to expand...
The fact that you've never heard of it sort of proves my point don't you think?
It's called selective indignation.
George W. Bush's White House "lost" 22 million emails
Clinton's email habits look positively transparent when compared with the subpoena-dodging, email-hiding, private-server-using George W. Bush administration. Between 2003 and 2009, the Bush White House "lost" 22 million emails. This correspondence included millions of emails written during the darkest period in America's recent history, when the Bush administration was ginning up support for what turned out to be a disastrous war in Iraq with false claims that the country possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and, later, when it was firing U.S. attorneys for political reasons.

Do you presume Hillary to be innocent since she was not convicted of any crime?
 
#19,717
#19,717
luthervol said:
The fact that you've never heard of it sort of proves my point don't you think?
It's called selective indignation.
George W. Bush's White House "lost" 22 million emails
Clinton's email habits look positively transparent when compared with the subpoena-dodging, email-hiding, private-server-using George W. Bush administration. Between 2003 and 2009, the Bush White House "lost" 22 million emails. This correspondence included millions of emails written during the darkest period in America's recent history, when the Bush administration was ginning up support for what turned out to be a disastrous war in Iraq with false claims that the country possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and, later, when it was firing U.S. attorneys for political reasons.

Do you presume Hillary to be innocent since she was not convicted of any crime?
Click to expand...
You are moving the goalposts. She lost them because of an illegal server. I'm not defending the loss by Bush, but your girl's is much worse. Your continued question concerning her 'innocence' is laughable. It is a well known fact that she had the server and that it violated comsec protocol. She knew that. Soldiers are in prison for far less egregious activities.
 
#19,720
#19,720
SpaceCoastVol said:
You are moving the goalposts. She lost them because of an illegal server. I'm not defending the loss by Bush, but your girl's is much worse. Your continued question concerning her 'innocence' is laughable. It is a well known fact that she had the server and that it violated comsec protocol. She knew that. Soldiers are in prison for far less egregious activities.
Click to expand...
So you think it is legitimate to consider Hillary guilty based on your understanding of the facts despite the fact that she has yet to be proven guilty?

Is it equally legitimate for one to consider Trump guilty based on his/her understanding of the facts despite the fact that he has yet to be proven guilty?
 
#19,722
#19,722
RockyTop85 said:
I haven’t even said anything that you could misinterpret and declare taken apart, Quixote.
Click to expand...
True. You ran like hell away from the transcript dropping comment last night which is why I asked about 5 times on it. So you got a more accurate transcript or an official whom has contested its accuracy? I think that’s number six now.

I was merely commenting on your usual pissy attitude in reply which you in fact provided an example of above while still avoiding the question relating to your transcript droppings

😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#19,723
#19,723
evillawyer said:
You do know that a deponent ALWAYS gets to review their deposition transcript and correct testimony or the transcript thereof before signing it. Many times deponents will correct testimony during the deposition itself. This is standard stuff.
Click to expand...
Yep. And this is the same deponent you tried to pass off as trying Trump to Burisma in the July 25 call... after she recanted her testimony and amended her statement. Womp womp 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD and hjeagle1vol
#19,724
#19,724
NorthDallas40 said:
Yep. And this is the same deponent you tried to pass off as trying Trump to Burisma in the July 25 call... after she recanted her testimony and amended her statement. Womp womp 😂
Click to expand...

Like I said, you do not read well.

Here's exactly what I said:

"At least two -- Vindman and the woman who had "burisma" in her notes from the call."
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top