W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 125,164
- Likes
- 319,692
reagan started us on our merry decline into the debt we now have.
The defense is typically not allowed to present an argument or present evidence or even be present. The prosecution is free to present or withhold whatever evidence and witnesses they choose.
First they came for Trump. And EL didn’t care. Because she wasn’t Trump and she hated him.
It’s disheartening to see people who are so called legal professionals so excited about this because they hate the Orange Buffoon. Nothing stays the same in this country and you’re pointing a weapon (sorry if that’s triggering) at Trump that could be pointed at you in 5 years.
That’s freaking hilarious. The man makes racist comments constantly, things that you would cry about if Trump said the exact same thing. We know your morals only apply to Reps. All bets are off with Dems.Please.
I was entering 6th grade when Nashville de-segregated. I saw the white flight. I saw private schools popping up everywhere. I heard good people say and do the wrong things. It was certainly a time of change. Some did, some just dug in. I have nothing but respect for the people who allowed themselves to actually grow and willingly opened their eyes to things they couldn't see before.
I'm arguing that there had been times of slight fluctuations. Reagan is the first to have a double digit rate of increase during a time of supposed "prosperity". He's the first to claim a roaring economic success, while using a double digit rate of increase in deficit spending. (Smoke and mirrors.....voodoo economics.....Reaganomics....)
The perceived success certainly didn't go unnoticed by future politicians.
Are you really that naive that you don't understand how the GJ process works? It's a one sided spin against the person the prosecutor wants to indict and in a place like NYC where 9/10 people vote democratic, you think was somehow impartial?Again, a grand jury indited him not Bragg. Bragg simply laid out the evidence of violation(s) of the law.
Don't we want politicians to be held accountable when the evidence presents itself and a jury sees merit?
Now trump will get what he wants - a platform to complain about how unfair life is while begging for donations.
I don't get it, you folks bitch about the politicians getting away with crimes (see hillary clinton and the "lock her up" screeches") and then fall all over yourselves clutching your pearls when your flavor actually gets held accountable.
I'm going to say that this is a case of creative interpretation of the law to gain an indictment and no he didn't break the law.
Please.
I was entering 6th grade when Nashville de-segregated. I saw the white flight. I saw private schools popping up everywhere. I heard good people say and do the wrong things. It was certainly a time of change. Some did, some just dug in. I have nothing but respect for the people who allowed themselves to actually grow and willingly opened their eyes to things they couldn't see before.