The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

Luth. Pelosi. All these communist think alike.
View attachment 567324
What? He certainly has the right to prove his innocense. Do you not believe he has that right?

No one says he has an obligation to do so. In order to be convicted, he has to be proven guilty; but he has the right to defend himself, and the best way of doing that is proving innocense.....again, a right, not an obligation.
 
What? He certainly has the right to prove his innocense. Do you not believe he has that right?

No one says he has an obligation to do so. In order to be convicted, he has to be proven guilty; but he has the right to defend himself, and the best way of doing that is proving innocense.....again, a right, not an obligation.
We don’t have to “prove our innocence” in this country. We are innocent until proven guilty.

You central planning loving, authoritarian communist clown you.
 
I had previously assumed it was self evident, but I've learned over the past few years that what is obvious to most is completely unknowable to others. (How else can you explain Trumpism?)
So you stupidly believe that he was too despicable for Dems? That’s hilarious. The fact that you think there’s some high road on the left is comical. You aren’t nearly as smart as you think you are if you think the left is altruistic. All of these people are out for nothing but power.
 
Are you going to stomp your feet and tell me "I want it now?"

willy-wonka-and-the-chocolate-factory-veruca-salt.gif
Going with the original. Damn, you are old. That’s ok. I would have too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
We don’t have to “prove our innocence” in this country. We are innocent until proven guilty.

You central planning loving, authoritarian communist clown you.
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Did I EVER said anyone had to prove their innocense? NO ONE SAID THAT!!!!

Can you guys read?

But he does have the right to defend himself and prove his innocense.

Surely y'all can comprehend the difference.
SMDH
 
So you stupidly believe that he was too despicable for Dems? That’s hilarious. The fact that you think there’s some high road on the left is comical. You aren’t nearly as smart as you think you are if you think the left is altruistic. All of these people are out for nothing but power.
It's on a continuum.
 
????
Is the two year investigation in GA run by commies? Is the grand jury made up of commies?
Since you don't know, GJ's only hear one side.

The investigators are certainly commies if they belive that tripe they brought to the GA GJ
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I said he was guilty of many things (ex: ill advised call and choice of words with Raffensperger, knowingly lying about the election being stolen, teaching his press secratary how to lie, etc...)
I did not say he is guilty of criminal behavior....I certainly believe he was, grand juries believe he probably was, that's why there will be trials.

even your list includes speculation on several items - none of which, btw are criminal offenses.

you did say that you hoped people as guilty as Trump are prosecuted fully which implies you've deemed him guilty of criminal behavior.

the most dangerous tyrants are those who don't believe they are tyrants
 
It's on a continuum.
As is everything Luther. What’s funny is you use that to justify your position. “Yes, this person is an 8 on a 10-scale with 10 being the most horrible person ever, but he’s not a 10 like Trump so it’s ok to support that 8!” Of course, the fallacy in your argument is that these continuums are subjective even though you talk of them as if they’re fact.
 
even your list includes speculation on several items - none of which, btw are criminal offenses.

you did say that you hoped people as guilty as Trump are prosecuted fully which implies you've deemed him guilty of criminal behavior.

the most dangerous tyrants are those who don't believe they are tyrants
No it doesn't. It means I think there is enough evidence to endict him for criminal behavior.
 
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Did I EVER said anyone had to prove their innocense? NO ONE SAID THAT!!!!

Can you guys read?

But he does have the right to defend himself and prove his innocense.

Surely y'all can comprehend the difference.
SMDH
No.

He has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. This isn’t semantics. This is a clear difference in how the constitutional republic advocate thinks and how you commie bastard progressives think. See the Pelosi tweet for evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and DC_Vol
Political persecution is for commies.


MAGA still pretending the gangster does nothing wrong when he's been an obvious and total gangster all his adult life--corrupt and dishonest to the bone. It only shows how stupid and politically poisoned MAGA people are. These are people who will actually go on camera and proclaim that they like the gangster's "christian values." Oh, my. Alternate reality stuff! "But, but but, whatabout Biden crime family?" Did I say it? Oh, my.

MAGA should just say: "We hate Dems and don't give a $hit what the gangster does" and thus spare us from their embarrassingly stupid attempts to deflect and deny.

Former Vice President Mike Pence said 'anyone who puts themselves over the Constitution should never be president of the United States,' referring to Donald Trump, a day after he was indicted for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election https://reut.rs/3rMS7o8
 
Last edited:
No.

He has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. This isn’t semantics. This is a clear difference in how the constitutional republic advocate thinks and how you commie bastard progressives think. See the Pelosi tweet for evidence.
Not at all. If a person is indicted, they can plead the 5th or they can offer a defense....they have rights.
 

VN Store



Back
Top