Tman44
God Father of Soul
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 3,684
- Likes
- 25,186
What kind of moron gives money to a billionaire?Imagine a "billionaire" having to beg for money to pay his criminal legal bills.
Pathetic, but just underscores the grift.
I've got 11,780 Stanley Nickles that says @Franklin Pierce didn't donate $500.
No, I think you’re being intentionally obtuse.What was Kennedy's intent??? Fraudulent or question the election??? I believe you assuming Trump's intent because you don't like him.
MAGA, b*tches!
With all these arraignments, Trump be like, "Let it (ar)raign over me"
No being obtuse, you applying intent to a person and situation that is similar to a historical situation.. Kennedy didn't need to press the issie cause the recount showed in his favor. Nixon used his power to reject and apply the new electors via unanimous consent. Mean the VP could request as s such until the law changed in 22. Now that being said. Trump believed he didn't get a fair chance with any lawsuit jt was brought as almost all were dismissed procedurally. So his intent was same as Kennedy and that was to win the election....No, I think you’re being intentionally obtuse.
I’m inferring intent from the fact that they tried to get the vice president to overturn the election even after all those courts ruled against them (which was one of the distinguishing characteristics that you ignored). Whether it can be tied directly to Trump, I don’t know, but they clearly didn’t care whether they had a legitimate issue, they just wanted to win.
It’s not similar.No being obtuse, you applying intent to a person and situation that is similar to a historical situation.. Kennedy didn't need to press the issie cause the recount showed in his favor. Nixon used his power to reject and apply the new electors via unanimous consent. Mean the VP could request as s such until the law changed in 22. Now that being said. Trump believed he didn't get a fair chance with any lawsuit jt was brought as almost all were dismissed procedurally. So his intent was same as Kennedy and that was to win the election....
It's the same on a smaller scale and less impactful....there was a legitimate question about the results in those states, lawsuit were filed, electors were selected, electors for the losing side submitted their votes in case the lawsuits went thru...once the. Didn't the Trump electors were null and void...in fact even if Trump had been able to overturn with lawsuits those electors were still given to Biden and Pence would have had to request the same thing Nixon did...It’s not similar.
There was a legitimate question about who won Hawaii. Hawaii didn’t swing the outcome of the election. They didn’t try other means to overturn the election after recounts and court challenges failed.
It’s like Henry Ruggs pointing to some grandma running over a mugger with her car in self defense and saying “see, it’s the same.”
You do realize the home team or the favorites always make those quotes right?
For example, I will use this example for the less sophisticated mind. If Tennessee and Vanderbilt were playing last years football game. After the game, Tennessee fans would've said Vols bi**hes, not Vandy bi**hes!
Even a 5th grader knows how to use a simple phrase correctly. It doesn't say much for the adult struggling with simple nomenclature. You must've consulted with Jill Biden on writing.