Tman44
God Father of Soul
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 3,684
- Likes
- 25,186
You are describing acts which most people would agree are inappropriate and even "creepy," but you are not describing pedophilia, unless you can prove the 'groping' involved the touching of genitalia (and you can't).Lol. Yea sniffing and groping kids who are obviously uncomfortable with his presence. Taking showers with his daughter. Definitely nothing to see here. Keep propping up a lifelong imbecile and pedophile.
You are describing acts which most people would agree are inappropriate and even "creepy," but you are not describing pedophilia, unless you can prove the 'groping' involved the touching of genitalia (and you can't).
.... and don't get me started on the showering with his daughter thing from the diary ... that does no prove pedophilia, even if what was written is 100% true. It seems like you don't even know what "pedophilia" means.
Well you don't know what a forgery is.You are describing acts which most people would agree are inappropriate and even "creepy," but you are not describing pedophilia, unless you can prove the 'groping' involved the touching of genitalia (and you can't).
.... and don't get me started on the showering with his daughter thing from the diary ... that does no prove pedophilia, even if what was written is 100% true. It seems like you don't even know what "pedophilia" means.
Not trying to blow sunshine up your ass, but it’s hard to see any legitimately nonpartisan take that lists you among the forum’s most over the top.I think you're fos.
You are describing acts which most people would agree are inappropriate and even "creepy," but you are not describing pedophilia, unless you can prove the 'groping' involved the touching of genitalia (and you can't).
.... and don't get me started on the showering with his daughter thing from the diary ... that does no prove pedophilia, even if what was written is 100% true. It seems like you don't even know what "pedophilia" means.
Just because someone used a colloquialism in a negative manner does not mean another person is wrong using the same colloquialism. We all need to have enough common sense to understand context. Unfortunately, common sense is a rare commodity these days...I like Levin a lot. I am not a leftist and am not suggesting there was racist intent on his part. I think it was a poor choice of words, given the context.
Good grief .... you haven't pointed to an example of Joe Biden committing pedophilia. You are mostly speculating, from the basis of very little info.
What the F are you trying to defend? And even more, why? Joey B sniffs girls. Touches them inappropriately.... Unless you've been on Mars you've seen all of that. Now, if you have been on Mars, tell us all about itYou are describing acts which most people would agree are inappropriate and even "creepy," but you are not describing pedophilia, unless you can prove the 'groping' involved the touching of genitalia (and you can't).
.... and don't get me started on the showering with his daughter thing from the diary ... that does no prove pedophilia, even if what was written is 100% true. It seems like you don't even know what "pedophilia" means.
I'm not defending anything Biden can be shown to have done ... I'm just saying that pedophilia is a very serious accusation, and what Biden can be seen doing in photos and videos is not pedophilia. Creepy? Sure. Inappropriate? Yes. It's not pedophilia.What the F are you trying to defend? And even more, why? Joey B sniffs girls. Touches them inappropriately.... Unless you've been on Mars you've seen all of that. Now, if you have been on Mars, tell us all about it![]()
I just don't get it. Why? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck? As Joey B says "come on man, "I'm not defending anything Biden can be shown to have done ... I'm just saying that pedophilia is a very serious accusation, and what Biden can be seen doing in photos and videos is not pedophilia. Creepy? Sure. Inappropriate? Yes. It's not pedophilia.
Pedophilia should not be used as an all purpose term.
Because what he can be seen doing in video and in photographs is not pedophilia ... and he has never been accused of pedophilia. I don't accuse people of sex crimes, just because they "look the part." It's an immature line of thinking.I just don't get it. Why? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck? As Joey B says "come on man, "
Because what he can be seen doing in video and in photographs is not pedophilia ... and he has never been accused of pedophilia. I don't accuse people of sex crimes, just because they "look the part." It's an immature line of thinking.
Ok, make sense. I just think it is REALLY creepy how he smells girls hair. VERY CREEPY.Because what he can be seen doing in video and in photographs is not pedophilia ... and he has never been accused of pedophilia. I don't accuse people of sex crimes, just because they "look the part." It's an immature line of thinking.
I'm not defending anything Biden can be shown to have done ... I'm just saying that pedophilia is a very serious accusation, and what Biden can be seen doing in photos and videos is not pedophilia. Creepy? Sure. Inappropriate? Yes. It's not pedophilia.
Pedophilia should not be used as an all purpose term.