landscapingvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2012
- Messages
- 11,638
- Likes
- 15,722
Yes indeed, tax cuts are obviously not for regular people, considering that half of Americans no longer pay a dime in actual income tax. But sure, let’s keep shifting that burden to „the rich“ (liberal definition: anyone making more than me)How's all that extra tax saving treating you right now? It's paid for eventually unless there are cuts to go along with it
Tax cuts aren't for regular people and never have been. Neither are increases for that matter
It sounds like you are alluding to the Laffer Curve theory (supply-side economics), which Ronald Reagan ascribed to, but the answer to your question is "No."Historically haven’t tax cuts resulted in increased federal revenue? If that’s indeed the case then tax cuts are not inflationary.
The libs have to talk about Trump to divert from their catastrophic, **** for brains they elected. There's not one positive from that communist regime. It's a total train wreck that will take decades to recover from if the country survives at all. You libs keep talking Trump though.
Once again, if you don't think that inflation would be just as bad right now in Trump's 2nd term, then you really don't know what you're talking about.Just look at the Dow, food prices, gas prices, etc. if you want some pure truth.
If by maga cult you mean the founding fathers then you'd be correct. I don't need the govt filtering info and delivering what they think I need to hearOf course the MAGA Cult opposes the Disinformation Governance Board since their leader and Fox News are the biggest purveyors of disinformation and their supporters and viewers will believe anything you tell them.
Once again, if you don't think that inflation would be just as bad right now in Trump's 2nd term, then you really don't know what you're talking about.
The most inflationary measure an administration can take is to push massive tax cuts while simultaneously increasing government spending.
^^^^ That is precisely what Trump did... and this was done at a time of economic expansion in 2017 and 2018, when stimulus wasn't needed.
Republicans think that there is never a bad time to cut taxes. George W. Bush cut taxes and then took us into 2 prolonged wars, and a very costly struggle to safeguard against terrorism.
Granted, GWB couldn't have predicted 9/11, and Trump couldn't have predicted COVID, but still ...
If you want to play the blame game, it should be pretty easy to see which two presidencies over the last 20 years were most responsible for inducing inflationary pressures. It's Bush and Trump - the two administrations who cut taxes, just before two calamities began, that required massive spending to cope with.
I'm just pointing out how ridiculous it is for Republicans to pretend to be outraged by inflation now .... after the significant role your presidents have played in its current creation.
Wrong.Evidently the most inflationary thing you can do is to push a BS energy policy. Check your prices on everything. You people can’t even admit how stupidly this administration operates.
Sorry, this historically bad inflation is on your boy.
Nevermind that tax revenues increased each year under the Trump Administration.Once again, if you don't think that inflation would be just as bad right now in Trump's 2nd term, then you really don't know what you're talking about.
The most inflationary measure an administration can take is to push massive tax cuts while simultaneously increasing government spending.
^^^^ That is precisely what Trump did... and this was done at a time of economic expansion in 2017 and 2018, when stimulus wasn't needed.
Republicans think that there is never a bad time to cut taxes. George W. Bush cut taxes and then took us into 2 prolonged wars, and a very costly struggle to safeguard against terrorism.
Granted, GWB couldn't have predicted 9/11, and Trump couldn't have predicted COVID, but still ...
If you want to play the blame game, it should be pretty easy to see which two presidencies over the last 20 years were most responsible for inducing inflationary pressures. It's Bush and Trump - the two administrations who cut taxes, just before two calamities began, that required massive spending to cope with.
I'm just pointing out how ridiculous it is for Republicans to pretend to be outraged by inflation now .... after the significant role your presidents have played in its current creation.
Wrong.
It is on the Presidents who were responsible for massive tax cuts, just before taking us into two prolonged wars, a costly homeland struggle against terrorism and a pandemic. Trump's tax cuts were particularly egregious, because they weren't needed at the time they were passed. We were already in the throes of an economic expansion.
You ignorant people think inflation of this magnitude happens instantly. It doesn't.
I should have been nicer about this. Sorry.Starting a post with LOL indicates that you really don't want to have a conversation, so thanks, but not interested.
Did the 2017 tax cut—the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act—pay for itself?