Pons or Bowden. But, probably won't make much difference in their minutes.
probably right. Barnes stated they'll platoon AE, so I'd expect JJJ, Bowden and Pons to share the load of slowing him down. Plavsic's minutes will be determined by how effective he is.I wouldn't mind seeing Vescovi, James, Pons, Fulkerson, Plavsic start and Bowden come off the bench to see if we can get him in his groove, but I doubt Barnes would do that. Bowden still brings alot to the table defensively, and Barnes values defense more than offense.
Only possible different starting lineup would be if we use this as an opportunity to bench Bowden. But against UGA, defensively I’m not sure I like a starting lineup of Vescovi, JJJ, Pons, Fulky, Plav
It's a hard one to call. I can't see Barnes benching Fulk for Uros which is the only easy way to put him in the starting lineup. The lineup you don't like above is the only other way I see him as a starter, and while I don't hate it, I don't really love it either. I do think it is the only likely option besides no change to the starting 5. Our current roster (at least with Bowden not scoring) is going to leave you weak somewhere.
I would hate to see Fulky get benched, but if Uros is as good as advertised, we could see that in a game or 2.
Makes me crazy... I have to go to the highest all-inclusive tier on TDS to get U, which has exactly zero other channels I give a crap about. ESPN really needs to include U programming in the ESPN+ subscription.Why are we on ESPN U. Ima call and have it added tomorrow I guess. My spectrum package does not include it
I have a question I’ve long since wondered. On espn site they have us as 3 point underdogs but give us a 58 percent chance to win. Mathematicaly I just don’t understand this. I’ve thought about this before as espn does that all the time across all the different sports but I just can’t ever think of the solution. What am I missing? How can a team both be the underdog and have a higher percentage chance of winning the game?Tennessee Volunteers: 10-5 (2-1 SEC)
@
Georgia Bulldogs: 10-5 (0-2 SEC)
GAME 16 | TENNESSEE at GEORGIA - Jan. 15, 2020 | 7:05 p.m. ET | Stegeman Coliseum (10,523)
Line: UT: +3
O/U: 136
TV: ESPNU / Watch
Radio: Vol Network / Listen
Satellite Radio: Sirrius: --- / XM: ---
Online: ESPN App
Georgia Game Notes
It’s their stupid power index. The line is a Vegas/betting thing. They aren’t dependent on one anotherI have a question I’ve long since wondered. On espn site they have us as 3 point underdogs but give us a 58 percent chance to win. Mathematicaly I just don’t understand this. I’ve thought about this before as espn does that all the time across all the different sports but I just can’t ever think of the solution. What am I missing? How can a team both be the underdog and have a higher percentage chance of winning the game?
Because made up statistics are meaningless.I have a question I’ve long since wondered. On espn site they have us as 3 point underdogs but give us a 58 percent chance to win. Mathematicaly I just don’t understand this. I’ve thought about this before as espn does that all the time across all the different sports but I just can’t ever think of the solution. What am I missing? How can a team both be the underdog and have a higher percentage chance of winning the game?
Teamrankings gives us a 46.5% chance to win and spread Ga -2.5I have a question I’ve long since wondered. On espn site they have us as 3 point underdogs but give us a 58 percent chance to win. Mathematicaly I just don’t understand this. I’ve thought about this before as espn does that all the time across all the different sports but I just can’t ever think of the solution. What am I missing? How can a team both be the underdog and have a higher percentage chance of winning the game?