The only selection committee joke worse than VOLS 3 seed….

#27
#27
Final Four:
Kansas vs Tennessee
Texas tech vs UCLA
Final:
Tennessee vs UCLA
Toss up in the final, hoping we win.
 
#29
#29
Stoerner Fumbles said:
The only Big Ten team on the fence was Rutgers. Their AD scheduled a weak early schedule, and they had some losses in November that killed their net. That said, they’ve beaten the top teams in their league and are playing very well. Rutgers is probably deserving. A&M was also deserving, maybe more so. Eight Big Ten Teams were top 40 NET. They are solid choices. Rutgers makes a strong case too. They should probably be in, but so should A&M. It’s a bad year for the committee. Duke got seeded high. So did KY. All that considered, it’s time to take off your Conspiracyville diapers and get focused on our team playing these so-called “basketball games”. They fought hard, got better, won the conference tournament for the first time in four decades etc. They’ve got a shot at going a long way. Let’s all buck up, and focus on that. We can talk about how global cooling is effecting your rheumatism in a month.
Click to expand...
Good lord another BS post by you. Shocker. 😂
 
#33
#33
Woodlawn VOL said:
Forget it, concentrate on the tourney. Time to worry about the game in front of you. Everybody is dangerous at this point, you got to take care of business at hand. GBO
Click to expand...

Yes. It was good filler while waiting for the opening round. Great motivation for the team hopefully. Now the discussion can be redirected to beating Longwood.
 
#35
#35
The Big 10 got 9 teams in last tournament as well and went a combined 8-9. They were the first conference to finish below .500 while having more than 7 teams in the entire history of the tournament. But the committee still values them more than everyone else. I would be satisfied if they strictly went off NET or a cumulative metric ranking for placing teams into the tournament outside of conference championships, no selection committee biases. The more we can eliminate the human element out of selection processes the better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: i2amavol
#36
#36
GUNTERSVOL said:
On Lunardi, He wants to predict the results, not define them. He is just connected enough to some insiders on the committee to know they were agenda driven and were prepared to impose their will regardless of the merits for their decisions. They are emboldened since they know the networks may question them, but never challenge them in a way that requires the analysis breakdown that leads to their work. If he challenges them personally he loses his connections. It is obvious he was informed we were going to be a three seed regardless of the tournament and all the logic in the world pointing to a higher seed.
Click to expand...

I get your logic, and if true then he should just move quickly along and discuss other potential seeds instead of saying the ridiculous garbage explanation he said about TN vs. UK seeding after the SECT game ended.
 
#37
#37
GUNTERSVOL said:
On Lunardi, He wants to predict the results, not define them. He is just connected enough to some insiders on the committee to know they were agenda driven and were prepared to impose their will regardless of the merits for their decisions. They are emboldened since they know the networks may question them, but never challenge them in a way that requires the analysis breakdown that leads to their work. If he challenges them personally he loses his connections. It is obvious he was informed we were going to be a three seed regardless of the tournament and all the logic in the world pointing to a higher seed.
Click to expand...

I get your logic, and if true then he should just move quickly along and discuss other potential seeds instead of saying the ridiculous garbage explanation he said about TN vs. UK seeding after the SECT game ended.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top