hohenfelsvol
How uwe doo-in?!?
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Messages
- 50,392
- Likes
- 2,738
You have demonstrated nothing. You may think you have and are awfully proud of yourself for your work but in the end, nothing.
Y'all may have tried to tell me otherwise, but the consumer does not pay for taxes on profits.
Y'all are also assuming corporations are not constantly maximizing profits. In your scenario, they clearly are NOT looking for the monopoly price. A well-run business is clearly charging what they should / can for any given product (as I've been saying from the beginning).
This is so elementary it doesn't bear discussing anymore. You've even given a simplified "cartel" model that proved my point right as rain. (In fact, it was a sales tax model, but I just went with it assuming it as a "cartel" model.)
has there ever been a post by someone who hasn't supported your assertion?
Yes.
However, in your case, somewhat surprisingly, you always seem to come up with some excellent supporting arguments for my points. You know your stuff.
To wit, your point regarding international competition was further support of my argument.
Well-run companies are already charging as much as they can for the products they sell. That is essentially what I have said all along. They cannot control prices at will, which is what y'all have said (incorrectly) from the beginning.
.
Well-run companies are already charging as much as they can for the products they sell. That is essentially what I have said all along. They cannot control prices at will, which is what y'all have said (incorrectly) from the beginning.
then if taxes go up, yet aren't up worldwide, wont they go out of business?
Even if the government suddenly placed 100% tax on all corporate profits NO CORPORATION WOULD HAVE TO GO OUT OF BUSINESS. Shareholders would be PO'ed, but the company could still keep running as they make more money than it takes to run the business.
Droski, ugh. This is why I felt forced to define PROFITS yesterday.
Even if the government suddenly placed 100% tax on all corporate profits NO CORPORATION WOULD HAVE TO GO OUT OF BUSINESS. Shareholders would be PO'ed, but the company could still keep running as they make more money than it takes to run the business.
Now, is that sensible? No. Do we want reinvestment? Yes. So look what happens with the "natural monopolies" of the municipal utilities. Surely I don't have to go over the economic science of those for you?
What determines their pricing decisions?
If a particular industry (say electronics) experienced a material drop in the price of their inputs (all else being equal) - would the price level in the industry drop?
this is ridiculous. please google time value of money. are you seriously arguing that corporations won't shut down if they aren't getting a return on their investment? what about the small business owner? doesn't he need profit to pay for his personal bills?