The Presbyterian Postgame Report

#27
#27
Yea, but if we had lost. I promise 50 other threads would of popped up and 3,000 other people. I see what you saying tho.

I'm usually moderate in my views of Zo and this tennessee team but if we had lost tonight, I would have started a negative thread myself lol
 
#28
#28
I'm usually moderate in my views of Zo and this tennessee team but if we had lost tonight, I would have started a negative thread myself lol


Lol, i feel ya. I don't post alot but i read alot of posts and threads. It's good that everyone can have a opinion. I don't really care for the name calling. I like when a man can debate and prove his point.
 
#32
#32
I'm about ready to end the Brandon Lopez experiment. Moore is just so much more talented, and those back to back turnovers in the second half sparked Pres's run. If we hadn'tve built a huge lead in the first half, it could have gotten seriously hairy.
 
#33
#33
I am intrigued by a line-up of Golden, McBee, McRae, Edwards, and Stokes. That's 2 guys that can get into the lane and score plus McBee hanging on the perimeter. I like Edwards because he is able to play from the mid range-to 3 point line on offense but big enough to effectively guard most other teams 4. That leaves Stokes more space to work and would slow down double teams from the other big man.

Richardson seems to be struggling now and Chievous is struggling as well (game speed is different than practice speed). So with all the guys out, Martin already playing guys big minutes, and this team prone to scoring droughts, I think this is his best scoring line-up right now.

Edwards has definitely earned himself more minutes IMO. I also like that lineup, but then again the minutes are probably just as important, give then starter minutes even if they aren't starting.
 

VN Store



Back
Top