The Problems with Trans-ideology

#2,476
#2,476
NashVol11 said:
Perfectly cool for kids:
Texans-cheerleader.jpeg


maxresdefault.jpg




HIDE THE KIDS!!!!!!!:



(Lol at him posting this as a gotcha and then all of the replies say "...what's the problem here they're just walking and having fun")
Click to expand...


Agreed, sexualizing kids is wrong. Sexualizing kids and confusing them about sex/gender is also wrong (drag shows for example)

Are you arguing against sexualizing kids in general or only when cis people do it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and davethevol
#2,478
#2,478
Vol8188 said:
Agreed, sexualizing kids is wrong. Sexualizing kids and confusing them about sex/gender is also wrong (drag shows for example)

Are you arguing against sexualizing kids in general or only when cis people do it?
Click to expand...

What part of those kids walking next to a drag queen and dabbing was "sexualizing kids" lmao

If you don't give a s*** about cheerleaders twerking in front of kids, it's not about "protecting the kids" at all
 
#2,479
#2,479
Vol8188 said:
Agreed, sexualizing kids is wrong. Sexualizing kids and confusing them about sex/gender is also wrong (drag shows for example)
Click to expand...

Oh no!!! This LinkedIn commercial is sexualizing kids by having a girl wear a man's shirt!!! Tell the authorities!!! So sexual and "confusing" I'm sure it will be banned from this site

 
#2,481
#2,481
"They know they have to f up the next generation starting it as young as possible"

Yes it's definitely trans people doing this:


51UNl5kirxL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg
 
#2,482
#2,482
Katie Hobbs sets Arizona veto record at 111 with Transgender Bathroom Bill Veto

Gov. Katie Hobbs (D-AZ) continues to up the record for most vetoes used by an Arizona governor. She vetoed five Republican bills, including one regarding a transgender bathroom use policy, Thursday.

Hobbs's new record is nearly double that of the previous record. It was set by Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano, who used 58 vetoes while dealing with a Republican majority in the legislature, the Arizona Mirror reported. Perhaps the most contentious bill Hobbs used her veto for on Thursday was Senate Bill 1040, called the "Arizona Accommodations for All Children Act." The bill would prevent transgender students from using the bathrooms or sleeping quarters opposite of their biological sex, but it also instructed schools to provide those students with "a reasonable accommodation."


Katie Hobbs sets Arizona veto record at 111 with transgender bathroom bill veto
 
#2,484
#2,484
NYC private schools Teaching ‘sexuality curriculum’ in woke Kindergarten classes

These elite prep-school kindergartens are going from the ABCs to the birds and the bees.

Posh private schools such as Dalton are indoctrinating kids as young as 4 and 5 with woke gender-identity programs and “sexuality curriculums,” The Post found.

One education consultant confirms that some of the city’s top private schools now ask about a child’s gender identity and preferred pronouns on their kindergarten admissions applications.

The schools — with kindergarten tuition north of $60,000 — shamelessly boast about the instruction in their online course materials.

Dalton’s First Program for grades K-3 on East 91st Street on the Upper East Side promises a curriculum that teaches “races” and “gender expressions.”

NYC private schools introduce 'sexuality curriculum' in kindergarten
 
#2,485
#2,485
NashVol11 said:
What part of those kids walking next to a drag queen and dabbing was "sexualizing kids" lmao

If you don't give a s*** about cheerleaders twerking in front of kids, it's not about "protecting the kids" at all
Click to expand...

Sure, that’s wrong. So is confusing children about the nature of reality. Idk how you fail to see that. If trannies were twerking in front of kids it would be even more wrong because it would include two negative elements (sexualization and confusion)
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#2,486
#2,486
NashVol11 said:
"They know they have to f up the next generation starting it as young as possible"

Yes it's definitely trans people doing this:


51UNl5kirxL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg
Click to expand...

Cant tell if trolling or just really, really dumb. Yes, those outfits are bad. Yes, non trans people also do bad things.

What in your mind does that prove?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, SpaceCoastVol, 82_VOL_83 and 2 others
#2,487
#2,487
Vol8188 said:
Sure, that’s wrong. So is confusing children about the nature of reality. Idk how you fail to see that. If trannies were twerking in front of kids it would be even more wrong because it would include two negative elements (sexualization and confusion)
Click to expand...

A kid walking next to a drag queen is not "confusing children about the nature of reality." Drag queens are part of reality and kids see people dressing up before they can even form memories. Clutch your pearls some more though
 
#2,488
#2,488
NashVol11 said:
A kid walking next to a drag queen is not "confusing children about the nature of reality." Drag queens are part of reality and kids see people dressing up before they can even form memories. Clutch your pearls some more though
Click to expand...

And if that drag Queen is twerking is that bad or only when cheerleaders do it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, AM64 and OrangeBoro
#2,489
#2,489
Vol8188 said:
Cant tell if trolling or just really, really dumb. Yes, those outfits are bad. Yes, non trans people also do bad things.

What in your mind does that prove?
Click to expand...

The concern about "but the children!!" is a bullsh** excuse to go after trans people over behavior that pales in comparison to the "grooming" that our society - namely the people on this board pretending to be "concerned about children" starting like two months ago - accepts and even encourages on a day to day basis
 
#2,490
#2,490
Vol8188 said:
And if that drag Queen is twerking is that bad or only when cheerleaders do it?
Click to expand...

Equally bad. Drag queens "twerking" almost never happens and there's a nationwide panic over it, cheerleader twerking happens at every single sporting event and crickets. The invented pearl clutching is ridiculous
 
#2,491
#2,491
NashVol11 said:
The concern about "but the children!!" is a bullsh** excuse to go after trans people over behavior that pales in comparison to the "grooming" that our society - namely the people on this board pretending to be "concerned about children" starting like two months ago - accepts and even encourages on a day to day basis
Click to expand...

You ignored the question. Would it be bad if trannies were to twerk for drag queens?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and 82_VOL_83
#2,492
#2,492
NashVol11 said:
Equally bad. Drag queens "twerking" almost never happens and there's a nationwide panic over it, cheerleader twerking happens at every single sporting event and crickets. The invented pearl clutching is ridiculous
Click to expand...

I’ve never seen a drag show that didn’t include twerking.
 
#2,495
#2,495
NashVol11 said:
The concern about "but the children!!" is a bullsh** excuse to go after trans people over behavior that pales in comparison to the "grooming" that our society - namely the people on this board pretending to be "concerned about children" starting like two months ago - accepts and even encourages on a day to day basis
Click to expand...

Showing people only care about grooming from one side, doesn’t mean we should accept/approve or grooming from the other side
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, 82_VOL_83 and NashVol11
#2,497
#2,497
NashVol11 said:
A kid walking next to a drag queen is not "confusing children about the nature of reality." Drag queens are part of reality and kids see people dressing up before they can even form memories. Clutch your pearls some more though
Click to expand...

Sure drag queens are part of reality but a very confusing part for a child. No different than how I wouldn’t intentionally try explaining to my toddler that some people get off by rubbing balloons on themselves.
 
#2,498
#2,498
Vol8188 said:
Showing people only care about grooming from one side, doesn’t mean we should accept/approve or grooming from the other side
Click to expand...

Obviously a fair statement. I would say the bar for "grooming" has been set artificially high for straight people and artificially low for trans people (IMO shaking hands with a drag queen is not "grooming", but some would say it is if they interact at all), and the actual line should be somewhere in between and be enforced consistently.

If it were, trans people would be far, far down the list of people taking heat over it (after everyone in the child pageant business, the church, everyone responsible for cheerleader outfits/dancing, everyone who talks about how a kid will be popular with girls when they get older, everyone who takes a kid to Hooters, everyone who glamorizes the idea of hooking up with an older babysitter/teacher as a teen, everyone who allows a kid to see a show/movie with any heterosexuality in it, etc. etc.)

If people actually cared to the level they pretend to care when it comes to trans people, damn near every parent in the country would have a lot of reevaluating to do
 
#2,499
#2,499
NashVol11 said:
Obviously a fair statement. I would say the bar for "grooming" has been set artificially high for straight people and artificially low for trans people (IMO shaking hands with a drag queen is not "grooming", but some would say it is if they interact at all), and the actual line should be somewhere in between and be enforced consistently.

If it were, trans people would be far, far down the list of people taking heat over it (after everyone in the child pageant business, the church, everyone responsible for cheerleader outfits/dancing, everyone who talks about how a kid will be popular with girls when they get older, everyone who takes a kid to Hooters, everyone who glamorizes the idea of hooking up with an older babysitter/teacher as a teen, everyone who allows a kid to see a show/movie with any heterosexuality in it, etc. etc.)

If people actually cared to the level they pretend to care when it comes to trans people, damn near every parent in the country would have a lot of reevaluating to do
Click to expand...

Things we agree on:

1. Yes, many expose their kids to absurdity like having your 4 year old take a photo with hooters girls.

2. Yes, the gay community is held to a higher standard in this regard.

Things I think you’re being willfully ignorant about:

1. Just like a hooter girl, a drag queen is an intentionally hyper seuxalized version of a woman. So if you oppose a kid taking their photo with hooters girls, you should have the same objection to drag queens.

2. The gay community is held to a higher standard because their is an inherent sexual hedonism within homosexuality. It’s the reason gay pride parades always contain fetishism, bdsm, men whipping each other in public, etc. It’s why homosexual married couples are far more likely to commit adultery, and it’s honeslty the complete opposite of what the objective of raising a child is. The objective is to civilize your child, not to reach them to give in to all of their naturalistic desires. The underlying problem is you’re attempting to make a false equivalency that doesn’t exist between heterosexual and homosexual relations.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#2,500
#2,500
Vol8188 said:
1. Just like a hooter girl, a drag queen is an intentionally hyper seuxalized version of a woman. So if you oppose a kid taking their photo with hooters girls, you should have the same objection to drag queens.
Click to expand...

A drag queen is an exaggerated depiction of a woman for comedic purposes, certainly doesn't need to be "hyper-sexualized" and I think pretty unequivocally less sexual than a Hooters girl hired because of her big boobs etc and wearing the least amount of clothes possible to show those sexual attributes off
 
  • Like
Reactions: OL SMOKEY
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top