The Problems with Trans-ideology

Oh, didn't realize you needed to hear about it.

My bar did a karaoke pop up on the pride event on Sevier Ave this month. Made a shitload of money and everyone had a blast.

There were kids there. Can't say I spotted any spread legged twerking beholden to them. Hope that doesn't disappoint anyone.
Well now they have nothing to FAP to man
 
Lmao it's hilarious how much this stuff makes y'all clutch your pearls.

There are hundreds of millions of starving children around the globe, and you give about as much of a f*** about them as you do about the kids being brought to these events by their parents.

It's a proxy war against weird **** you are unwilling to understand or accept. You're literally using these children as a vessel to screech.
 
The spiritual father of Trans Movement Dr John Money, his Twisted Experiment – and the Tragic Deaths of the Twin Boys whose lives were ruined. The harrowing true story is a cautionary tale for our times...

On May 4, 2004, David Reimer drove to a supermarket car park and, still sitting in the car, pulled out a shotgun and killed himself.

At 38, he ended a life that had been so full of pain and anguish that some who knew him were only surprised he had battled on for so long.

From when he was only a few months old until into his teenage years, David had been subjected to a perverse, cruel and disastrously misguided experiment by a celebrated sex psychologist who was determined to show the world that he could transform a boy into a girl.

The academic concerned — John Money — is often hailed as the spiritual father of today’s trans movement. His research underpins the central claim we hear so often nowadays: that while biological sex may be innate, ‘gender identity’ — a term that Money helped to popularise, along with coining the term ‘sexual orientation’ — is ‘socially constructed’.

From this stems the great modern progressive dogma: that sex is irrelevant and what truly matters is which gender a person ‘feels’ they are.

The spiritual father of trans movement Dr John Money and his twisted experiment | Daily Mail Online
 
Lmao it's hilarious how much this stuff makes y'all clutch your pearls.

There are hundreds of millions of starving children around the globe, and you give about as much of a f*** about them as you do about the kids being brought to these events by their parents.

It's a proxy war against weird **** you are unwilling to understand or accept. You're literally using these children as a vessel to screech.

Lol… just looking at the latest videos being posted here, it’s a bunch of gay people with their a**es out twerking on cars, or an old guy in his underwear shaking his a** towards little kids. So enlighten us, what is the deep meaning behind this that we just “don’t understand”?
 
Lmao it's hilarious how much this stuff makes y'all clutch your pearls.

There are hundreds of millions of starving children around the globe, and you give about as much of a f*** about them as you do about the kids being brought to these events by their parents.

It's a proxy war against weird **** you are unwilling to understand or accept. You're literally using these children as a vessel to screech.
Almost as bad as your pearl clutching when anything Christians/Christianity is posted, lol
 
Lmao it's hilarious how much this stuff makes y'all clutch your pearls.

There are hundreds of millions of starving children around the globe, and you give about as much of a f*** about them as you do about the kids being brought to these events by their parents.

It's a proxy war against weird **** you are unwilling to understand or accept. You're literally using these children as a vessel to screech.

What sort of lewd acts with kids present would it take for you to say that indignant opposition is warranted and is not merely "pearl clutching"? Is there a limit in your opinion?
 
I guess you need faith in something since there is no science behind this mental illness.


FzgBqbRX0AA-ICx

FzgBqbRWwAAlBgn
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
Lol… just looking at the latest videos being posted here, it’s a bunch of gay people with their a**es out twerking on cars, or an old guy in his underwear shaking his a** towards little kids. So enlighten us, what is the deep meaning behind this that we just “don’t understand”?

You can’t put much stock into what a bartender that slings beer at a hole in the wall says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
Lol… just looking at the latest videos being posted here, it’s a bunch of gay people with their a**es out twerking on cars, or an old guy in his underwear shaking his a** towards little kids. So enlighten us, what is the deep meaning behind this that we just “don’t understand”?

There is no deep meaning.

We have laws. There are no laws against that specific attire. If there were, we'd be arresting women at the beach in droves. I'm still waiting on the thread from you ninnies on women in Brazilian thongs at the beach.

Think of the children, 615! You monster!
 
There is no deep meaning.

We have laws. There are no laws against that specific attire. If there were, we'd be arresting women at the beach in droves. I'm still waiting on the thread from you ninnies on women in Brazilian thongs at the beach.

Think of the children, 615! You monster!

You’re changing the argument now. Your original statement was that people were “Pearl clutching” over the videos of an old man in nothing but his underwear Turning his a** towards young children and twerking towards them, or of a bunch of gay dudes and chicks in a** less bottoms twerking on cars and it was because we “refuse to understand it or accept it”. So help me understand an old man twerking for some 9 year olds, we’re all still waiting…
 


@luthervol

Where does this fit on your continuum?

It would fit on a bunch of different continuums, but basically I find it irrelevant and silly.
I think the extremes on both ends unnecessarily inflame the issue and empower one another.
Live and let live, the middle 90% is fine with that; don't be sucked into an extreme position.
 
It would fit on a bunch of different continuums, but basically I find it irrelevant and silly.
I think the extremes on both ends unnecessarily inflame the issue and empower one another.
Live and let live, the middle 90% is fine with that; don't be sucked into an extreme position.

Coming from the guy whose been sucked into an "extreme position" of constant Trump hate.
 
It would fit on a bunch of different continuums, but basically I find it irrelevant and silly.
I think the extremes on both ends unnecessarily inflame the issue and empower one another.
Live and let live, the middle 90% is fine with that; don't be sucked into an extreme position.

Scarlett:
I can't think about that right now. If I do, I'll go crazy. I'll think about that tomorrow.
 

VN Store



Back
Top