The Problems with Trans-ideology

“Your children will see us. Your children will love us. Your children will join us.”

That sure sounds like they’re targeting children with their message
Only for the drama queens who lost it over Bud Light. Seems like they’re saying it doesn’t matter if this generation is full of hateful idiots because the next one won’t be, which is what generally happens with LGBTQ+ rights
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
"Mommy, I so love this horrifying clown monster artistically expressing himself (twerking his hairy ass in my face). Why don't you love him? Is it because you're a hate filled bigot, mommy?"

Totally not grooming. Just normalizing deranged behavior towards kids in an effort to get the kids to abandon their parent's values. Not grooming, you idiots!
What was the “deranged behavior toward kids” said or described in this video lol. People so dramatic
 
Only for the drama queens who lost it over Bud Light. Seems like they’re saying it doesn’t matter if this generation is full of hateful idiots because the next one won’t be, which is what generally happens with LGBTQ+ rights

Calling another man a Queen as an insult feels very homophobic to me. Could you use less gendered language, especially when insulting others?
 
It is deranged behavior for a horrifying clown monster to insist that he be seen, accepted, and loved by children that do not belong to him. It is weird and creepy. Quit acting like it is normal.
Nothing happened to any children in that clip, nor was there any “insisting that they be accepted,” just a statement that the next generation will be more accepting which, again, is consistently true. Very dramatic of you
 
Only for the drama queens who lost it over Bud Light. Seems like they’re saying it doesn’t matter if this generation is full of hateful idiots because the next one won’t be, which is what generally happens with LGBTQ+ rights
That's quite a stretch you're making from "won't be hateful idiots" to "will join us". I take "join us" to mean they will join the group LGBTQ+...which they are doing. Young folks seem really confused about their sexuality and are hesitant to identify as straight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Nothing happened to any children in that clip, nor was there any “insisting that they be accepted,” just a statement that the next generation will be more accepting which, again, is consistently true. Very dramatic of you

The clip shows a goal to target kids. Why bring up kids at all? It's inappropriate

This is a far cry from the days of "just leave us along and stay out of our bedrooms.". The warnings from conservatives of yesteryear are coming true
 
Calling another man a Queen as an insult feels very homophobic to me. Could you use less gendered language, especially when insulting others?

yas-queen.gif
 
The clip shows a goal to target kids. Why bring up kids at all? It's inappropriate

This is a far cry from the days of "just leave us along and stay out of our bedrooms.". The warnings from conservatives of yesteryear are coming true
If they were "coming true" then the people arrested for child porn, child sexual abuse, etc. would be drag queens instead of police officers and Catholic priests
 
If they were "coming true" then the people arrested for child porn, child sexual abuse, etc. would be drag queens instead of police officers and Catholic priests

No, that's not it at all. You don't groom kids by watching child porn. You gotta do that in person by showing up for story hour in kindergarten and seeking them out in the midst of a parade by strutting and twerking up to them
 
No, that's not it at all. You don't groom kids by watching child porn. You gotta do that in person by showing up for story hour in kindergarten and seeking them out in the midst of a parade by strutting and twerking up to them
Yeah, you’re implying sexually inappropriate behavior toward children and I’m saying the people getting arrested for that aren’t drag queens, you just don’t have a response because the “grooming” pearl clutching was BS to begin with, targeted at stupid people who largely moved on after 2 months
 
Yeah, you’re implying sexually inappropriate behavior toward children and I’m saying the people getting arrested for that aren’t drag queens, you just don’t have a response because the “grooming” pearl clutching was BS to begin with, targeted at stupid people who largely moved on after 2 months
Don't get carried away with the use of "aren't"


This was not remotely an exhaustive search btw.
 
Yeah, you’re implying sexually inappropriate behavior toward children and I’m saying the people getting arrested for that aren’t drag queens, you just don’t have a response because the “grooming” pearl clutching was BS to begin with, targeted at stupid people who largely moved on after 2 months
I've never really been on the grooming bandwagon but those comments from that 15 sec video was awfully damning. It was inappropriate and sure sounded like they were marketing their lifestyle to kids. Us parents say "leave our kids out of this".
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
I've never really been on the grooming bandwagon but those comments from that 15 sec video was awfully damning. It was inappropriate and sure sounded like they were marketing their lifestyle to kids. Us parents say "leave our kids out of this".
Don’t think anyone is coming for your kids to turn them gay, it’s okay to relax
 
Don't get carried away with the use of "aren't"


This was not remotely an exhaustive search btw.
2 of those 4 aren’t even drag queens lol. Probably hundreds of times as many arrests of, say, police officers for the same thing without a moral panic over “groomers”
 
The clip shows a goal to target kids. Why bring up kids at all? It's inappropriate

This is a far cry from the days of "just leave us along and stay out of our bedrooms.". The warnings from conservatives of yesteryear are coming true
Slippery slopes gonna slip. Left just doesn't seem to get that it isn't right and left anymore, it's right and wrong.
 
2 of those 4 aren’t even drag queens lol. Probably hundreds of times as many arrests of, say, police officers for the same thing without a moral panic over “groomers”
Do you mean this person?

"Boren, who worked for the Fern Ridge School District before the allegations surfaced last year, was also pictured in an Instagram post prior to her arrest with an 11-year-old drag queen, who she claims to have mentored as a “drag mom.”"

Yeah, that's plenty close enough to qualify for the discussion. Same with

"A Milwaukee judge and former president of an LGBTQ organization that sponsored Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) events has been arrested on child pornography charges."

If you have to try and parse things that hard you know you're in trouble. These examples were from the first page of a search. Are you sure you want people to put in some real effort?

And your whataboutism is problematic. At an absolute minimum your "aren't drag queens" is patently false. So you try to cite whatabout others that do such things. That's fair because it absolutely does happen. It is zero defense to the subject at hand of course. What might be more realistically interesting is a more per capita investigation. I think we'd all agree the priesthood appears to be overrepresented. You sure those for the subject at hand wouldn't be also?
 
2 of those 4 aren’t even drag queens lol. Probably hundreds of times as many arrests of, say, police officers for the same thing without a moral panic over “groomers”


You're so anal about this I think you've lost yourself a little bit.
 
Do you mean this person?

"Boren, who worked for the Fern Ridge School District before the allegations surfaced last year, was also pictured in an Instagram post prior to her arrest with an 11-year-old drag queen, who she claims to have mentored as a “drag mom.”"

Yeah, that's plenty close enough to qualify for the discussion. Same with

"A Milwaukee judge and former president of an LGBTQ organization that sponsored Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) events has been arrested on child pornography charges."

If you have to try and parse things that hard you know you're in trouble. These examples were from the first page of a search. Are you sure you want people to put in some real effort?

And your whataboutism is problematic. At an absolute minimum your "aren't drag queens" is patently false. So you try to cite whatabout others that do such things. That's fair because it absolutely does happen. It is zero defense to the subject at hand of course. What might be more realistically interesting is a more per capita investigation. I think we'd all agree the priesthood appears to be overrepresented. You sure those for the subject at hand wouldn't be also?
Yes, I’m sure, and that’s a backward question. Do you have any evidence that they ARE overrepresented other than fearmongering BS?

(You don’t, because they are not and you fell for some obvious stupidity. Good talk)
 
Yes, I’m sure, and that’s a backward question. Do you have any evidence that they ARE overrepresented other than fearmongering BS?
??? I have no idea nor claimed to. I'd never even looked up any examples until prompted by your "aren't" statement which was immediately proven false. So since we absolutely know you original assertion to be false how false is it? Again, I don't know and haven't researched it at all, merely posited a question. You seem pretty deep in this, much more so than I. Do you have any vettable studies on the matter?

Actually, does anyone reading this run across anything? (As an aside I think there would be HUGE pushback on any negative publicity so that might be a problem)
 
??? I have no idea nor claimed to. I'd never even looked up any examples until prompted by your "aren't" statement which was immediately proven false. So since we absolutely know you original assertion to be false how false is it? Again, I don't know and haven't researched it at all, merely posited a question. You seem pretty deep in this, much more so than I. Do you have any vettable studies on the matter?

Actually, does anyone reading this run across anything? (As an aside I think there would be HUGE pushback on any negative publicity so that might be a problem)
So the point of this was “ACTUALLY THERE AREN’T LITERALLY ZERO, I FOUND 2.” Lmao what a waste of time. If you believe or are willing to suggest that drag queens are “overrepresented” with zero evidence at all then like I said, you fell for something stupid
 

VN Store



Back
Top