The Radical Islamic Terrorism Catch-All Thread

[n_huffhines]

... .and that is different, how again?

This is pretty sad, bro.

You're talking about "Why doesn't Saudi Arabia do....?"

I don't care what Saudi Arabia isn't doing. That's not a solution and *****ing about it doesn't lead to a solution. You could be 100% right, but we don't get anywhere.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

This is pretty sad, bro.

You're talking about "Why doesn't Saudi Arabia do....?"

I don't care what Saudi Arabia isn't doing. That's not a solution and *****ing about it doesn't lead to a solution. You could be 100% right, but we don't get anywhere.

And your *****ing about what the .gov does or does not do will lead to a solution?

You must really think the VN political forum carries some serious weight.

lol:lol:lol:lol:

 

[n_huffhines]

And your *****ing about what the .gov does or does not do will lead to a solution?

You must really think the VN political forum carries some serious weight.

lol:lol:lol:lol:

You have no ability whatsoever to follow what I'm saying. I think it's willful ignorance and you're not just an idiot like Tums.

 

[n_huffhines]

You don’t get to dictate the conversation and decide what is and isn’t relevant because certain things make you look bad and take away from your argument.

If he's asking me questions, I can tell him what I'm interested in talking about, right? You guys can say whatever you want, just don't respond to my posts with questions about nonsense and expect me to play ball.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

You have no ability whatsoever to follow what I'm saying. I think it's willful ignorance and you're not just an idiot like Tums.

No, it's because you don't make any sense. So let me try this then:

I don't think it is any of our business. It is not our government's (taxpayers) responsibility to fund these people. I am sorry if that is 'cruel', but you cannot save everybody and you have to make choices. THAT makes it political

 

[n_huffhines]

No, it's because you don't make any sense. So let me try this then:

I don't think it is any of our business. It is not our government's (taxpayers) responsibility to fund these people. I am sorry if that is 'cruel', but you cannot save everybody and you have to make choices. THAT makes it political

For the last damn time, it's not about saving Muslims, it's about avoiding the radicalization of them.

 

[tumscalcium]

And your *****ing about what the .gov does or does not do will lead to a solution?

You must really think the VN political forum carries some serious weight.

lol:lol:lol:lol:

Not VN, just him. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Huff is ridiculously naive. He doesn’t understand that there’s different societies, different cultures, different mindsets. When facts get in his way or when people bring up roadblocks in is argument he’ll just cast them aside. He has no understanding of the world and it’s hilarious watching his simple-minded thought process regarding world issues. Also, he thinks he actually matters.

It doesn’t matter what these other countries do. It up to us to not radicalize these Muslims. Also,
We need to stop being world police.

-huff

He’s adorable.

 

[n_huffhines]

Not VN, just him. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Huff is ridiculously naive. He doesn’t understand that there’s different societies, different cultures, different mindsets. When facts get in his way or when people bring up roadblocks in is argument he’ll just cast them aside. He has no understanding of the world and it’s hilarious watching his simple-minded thought process regarding world issues. Also, he thinks he actually matters.

It doesn’t matter what these other countries do. It up to us to not radicalize these Muslims. Also,
We need to stop being world police.

-huff

He’s adorable.

"English, mother****er, do you speak it?"

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

For the last damn time, it's not about saving Muslims, it's about avoiding the radicalization of them.

LOL So giving them free, unfettered access to a country where diversity is the 'goal' will discourage radicalization? Are you ****ing high?

And Tums is right. You completely discount my argument because it doesn't fit your narrative.

 

[n_huffhines]

LOL So giving them free, unfettered access to a country where diversity is the 'goal' will discourage radicalization? Are you ****ing high?

Who is giving them free, unfettered access? Who is promoting this idea? I'm just saying banning them isn't necessarily going to work. You're high, bro. You can't even comprehend the points I'm making and then you're inventing points for me.

 

[tumscalcium]

"English, mother****er, do you speak it?"

I’ll talk to my phone about this later.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Who is giving them free, unfettered access? Who is promoting this idea? I'm just saying banning them isn't necessarily going to work. You're high, bro. You can't even comprehend the points I'm making and then you're inventing points for me.

Well then why don't you dumb it down for me?

We can't ban them because that doesn't work. Ready? Go.

 

[n_huffhines]

Reread the last two pages. I explained why it won't necessarily work, multiple times.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Reread the last two pages. I explained why it won't necessarily work, multiple times.

I went back to page 96 and read every post you wrote. You have offered nothing. Prove me wrong. There might be one way back on 96, but everything after was just deflection.

I still want to know what the 'solution' is. Adding more to the welfare rolls ain't it.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

r

You have no ability whatsoever to follow what I'm saying. I think it's willful ignorance and you're not just an idiot like Tums.

If he's asking me questions, I can tell him what I'm interested in talking about, right? You guys can say whatever you want, just don't respond to my posts with questions about nonsense and expect me to play ball.

For the last damn time, it's not about saving Muslims, it's about avoiding the radicalization of them.

"English, mother****er, do you speak it?"

Who is giving them free, unfettered access? Who is promoting this idea? I'm just saying banning them isn't necessarily going to work. You're high, bro. You can't even comprehend the points I'm making and then you're inventing points for me.

Please show me where you offered ANY kind of solution.

 

[Wafflestomper]

I still want to know what the 'solution' is. Adding more to the welfare rolls ain't it.

Yeah, we should do something fiscally responsible, like invading multiple countries and occupying them for decades! That will work! Prove that it won't!

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Yeah, we should do something fiscally responsible, like invading multiple countries and occupying them for decades! That will work! Prove that it won't!

I'm all for bringing ALL the troops home and letting Europe fend for itself. No problem there. Your boy Obama didn't get us out of very much now did he?

 

[Wafflestomper]

I'm all for bringing ALL the troops home and letting Europe fend for itself. No problem there. Your boy Obama didn't get us out of very much now did he?

Who said he was my boy?

 

[n_huffhines]

I went back to page 96 and read every post you wrote. You have offered nothing. Prove me wrong. There might be one way back on 96, but everything after was just deflection.

I still want to know what the 'solution' is. Adding more to the welfare rolls ain't it.

Now suddenly the conversation is about me coming up with a solution? I never pretended to have a solution. You weren't asking for one until this post.

I am looking for the best solution. I don't think there are any satisfactory solutions. I am saying that a ban probably won't work.

You're impossibly difficult.

 

[norrislakevol]

I have a solution. It's cheap, effective, faster than any other solutions, and will save lives.

1) Treat them like Saddam Hussein would. Round up any suspected member of Isis, the Taliban, ect and immediately and publicly execute them. Add those that have financed them or helped them to the mix as well. (That means quick execution of those that commit Islamic terror on U.S. soil as well.)

2) Hack their bank accounts and drain them, no matter what country their funds are located in. Soon no one will accept terrorist money.

That's about it. Take their money and make them fear you. Of course, no leader would ever have the stones to do this because there are far too many chirping idiots out there that think that winning their hearts and minds will work.

 

[Wafflestomper]

I have a solution. It's cheap, effective, faster than any other solutions, and will save lives.

1) Treat them like Saddam Hussein would. Round up any suspected member of Isis, the Taliban, ect and immediately and publicly execute them. Add those that have financed them or helped them to the mix as well. (That means quick execution of those that commit Islamic terror on U.S. soil as well.)

2) Hack their bank accounts and drain them, no matter what country their funds are located in. Soon no one will accept terrorist money.

That's about it. Take their money and make them fear you. Of course, no leader would ever have the stones to do this because there are far too many chirping idiots out there that think that winning their hearts and minds will work.

Yeah, immediately killing people you suspect of being terrorists couldnt possibly backfire. No way someone abuses that kind of power.

 

[tumscalcium]

Yeah, immediately killing people you suspect of being terrorists couldnt possibly backfire. No way someone abuses that kind of power.

I got this.

 

[n_huffhines]

I have a solution. It's cheap, effective, faster than any other solutions, and will save lives.

1) Treat them like Saddam Hussein would. Round up any suspected member of Isis, the Taliban, ect and immediately and publicly execute them. Add those that have financed them or helped them to the mix as well. (That means quick execution of those that commit Islamic terror on U.S. soil as well.)

2) Hack their bank accounts and drain them, no matter what country their funds are located in. Soon no one will accept terrorist money.

That's about it. Take their money and make them fear you. Of course, no leader would ever have the stones to do this because there are far too many chirping idiots out there that think that winning their hearts and minds will work.

Is 1 even possible without killing many innocents? It's definitely not possible to do without radicalizing more Muslims. You think they are scared of death, but we're not worried about the nice Muslims. We're worried about the ones who are happy to die for Islam. Executing people will not scare them into good behavior. It will have the opposite effect.

How do you do the latter without confiscating non-terrorist/honest money? If you can, do it. Just seems impossible to empower the deep state that much without ****ing everything up.

 

[norrislakevol]

Yeah, immediately killing people you suspect of being terrorists couldnt possibly backfire. No way someone abuses that kind of power.

Wouldn't backfire with the radical muzzies. They would be trembling in fear. Now the rest of the world would pitch a fit of course. There is no way you can permanently defeat an enemy like this on the battle field in a "gentlemanly" way. But, like I said, no one will ever have the fortitude to really do what is needed to end it.

 

[Wafflestomper]

Wouldn't backfire with the radical muzzies. They would be trembling in fear. Now the rest of the world would pitch a fit of course. There is no way you can permanently defeat an enemy like this on the battle field in a "gentlemanly" way. But, like I said, no one will ever have the fortitude to really do what is needed to end it.

Yeah the terrorists who are ready to die for their cause are going to be trembling in fear at the thought of becoming martyrs. Iron clad plan.