EconVol92
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 1,338
- Likes
- 3,063
I will agree that Fulmer was a great recruiter, but I will not agree that he was a great coach.
You can't let one national title that I personally think was more about Cutcliffe than Fulmer cloud your judgement about how good Fulmer was .
Then if you throw in his stint as AD it gets even worse and I will always believe that he did more to harm this program out of his own vanity and a desire to pass Neyland as the winningest coach is school history.
Clemson stepped into the void left by Fulmer and had great success.
You can't let one national title that I personally think was more about Cutcliffe than Fulmer cloud your judgement about how good Fulmer was .
Then if you throw in his stint as AD it gets even worse and I will always believe that he did more to harm this program out of his own vanity and a desire to pass Neyland as the winningest coach is school history.
Clemson stepped into the void left by Fulmer and had great success.