milohimself
RIP CITY
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 48,891
- Likes
- 29
That's ridiculous. Let me pick apart the ways in which that incentive idea sucks.
1. These are guys in the NFL. Some of them (SOME) make a lot of money, but that is not one of the main reasons they play. Fear of losing is all the motivation 99% of guys in the League need.
2. Team sport. This ain't MLB where the team concept is comparatively minimal or the NBA where a single great player can guide his team to many wins. In football, an individual's success is about 10% his effort and skill and 90% of the effort and skill of the guys around him. Paul Posluszny is one of the better LB's in the league, but he would get paid nothing because he's on the Bills roster while the #2 or #3 guy on the Pats or Colts could surpass that with incentives. Garbage.
3. Fairness. This goes back to a key concept people seem to forget about this lockout: If the owners can group up and collectively bargain their end (which they are running away with) then so can the players. With that, if the players are taking massive risks by playing the game, then the owners need to be taking risks by signing players. Yes, it sucks when you write up a big contract for a guy who doesn't work hard or can't cut it. You know what? Live with it, you're choosing whose services you buy.
4. Rookie salary cap. I wanna get on board with this, but it's the way market values have been going. The average NFL player is in the league what, three or four years? And then they leave mostly due to injury, which is mostly chronic in nature. If they're not gonna get medical coverage, then they damn sure deserve their market value to pay for the medical bills for the rest of their life to treat injuries that they got getting to the NFL in the first place.
1. These are guys in the NFL. Some of them (SOME) make a lot of money, but that is not one of the main reasons they play. Fear of losing is all the motivation 99% of guys in the League need.
2. Team sport. This ain't MLB where the team concept is comparatively minimal or the NBA where a single great player can guide his team to many wins. In football, an individual's success is about 10% his effort and skill and 90% of the effort and skill of the guys around him. Paul Posluszny is one of the better LB's in the league, but he would get paid nothing because he's on the Bills roster while the #2 or #3 guy on the Pats or Colts could surpass that with incentives. Garbage.
3. Fairness. This goes back to a key concept people seem to forget about this lockout: If the owners can group up and collectively bargain their end (which they are running away with) then so can the players. With that, if the players are taking massive risks by playing the game, then the owners need to be taking risks by signing players. Yes, it sucks when you write up a big contract for a guy who doesn't work hard or can't cut it. You know what? Live with it, you're choosing whose services you buy.
4. Rookie salary cap. I wanna get on board with this, but it's the way market values have been going. The average NFL player is in the league what, three or four years? And then they leave mostly due to injury, which is mostly chronic in nature. If they're not gonna get medical coverage, then they damn sure deserve their market value to pay for the medical bills for the rest of their life to treat injuries that they got getting to the NFL in the first place.