Spacey is overrated, IMO. Leo 1m* better and was the villain in Django and does accents, which I don't think Spacey did. Edit, he did a southern accent I'm House of Cards
I think any white person in the world could portray a red neck slave owner and portray it pretty well. Just watch deliverance and rinse and repeat with a splash of antebellum thrown in.
If you are in a tough spot and see Matt Damon, hang out with him. Rescue team will be inbound.
Have you seen the movie? He's not a redneck. He's the ruling class. I don't think this role is especially challenging, but I think what he did with it is awesome. The accent is great because he doesn't do what everybody does, and that's over-do it...but the point with Django is that he played a villain.
Leo's done a bunch of accents (Boston, Irish, South African all come to mind), and I wouldn't say he killed all of them, but he passed (because he didn't overdo it with any of them).
Spacey can play evil and crazy so well just look at his performances in seven or in the usual suspects to see a fine example.Replace both and add Kevin Spacey. Spacey may be nuts but he can play nice guy, evil guy, crazy guy and each is amazing. Brad nor Leo have ever been villians. Neither has Hank.
I would really enjoy you connecting the dots on the comparison. I am completely lost even though I have watched Spacey and I listen to Weezer. TIA
Thank you. Understand perfectly, now.Hahaha. I think Spacey is great. Weezer is one of my favorite bands all time. First concert. Own every album. Weezer is always doing new things. One album will be full emo. Another will be happy beach songs. One will be a throwback to 80's synth music. But no matter what they do, it always sounds like Weezer. I know why it always sounds like Weezer (Rivers' voice).
When I see Kevin Spacey doing anything, it's Kevin Spacey doing it. Not the character. In this case, IDK what it is about him, but it usually takes me out of the movie if it's something where he swings big, like KPax or Lex Luthor-type roles.
Thank you. Understand perfectly, now.
Isn't that phenomenon more common than uncommon for artists, though? As I have thought about the last sentence I typed (about 3 min) real time, I am having a hard time thinking of a musical artist who doesn't sound like themselves even as their style, or genre, evolves. I know there are some but I cannot remember any atm. I have thought of a couple of actors who seem to do it routinely... Gary Oldham and DDL.
I just thought of a band who has done what you're describing. Queen. They evolved and did different things with their sound even though when you hear them you know it is Freddy.Yeah, I would say it's probably pretty common, but also I do think a lot of bands that do try to do new big things are actually pretty successful at it reinventing their sound. Even with Paul McCartney's distinct voice, the early Beatles and late Beatles are completely different experiences. Look at the Rolling Stones...it's always Mick Jagger, but I only like less than a decade of the Stones (which I absolutely love), and the rest I could completely do without. It's not like they sucked...other people love these distinctly different eras of the Stones. Early Radiohead vs. late. Daft Punk.
Pearl Jam is always going to sound like Pearl Jam. Same with Weezer. But I do think the uber talented who don't have those overwhelmingly recognizable voices can do a lot to become something totally new-sounding.
Also, I think a lot of the time it's a personal thing. It doesn't happen to me with Leo, but I can see that if somebody were to say that's how they view him.
Give me 3 Weezer songs you really like.Hahaha. I think Spacey is great. Weezer is one of my favorite bands all time. First concert. Own every album. Weezer is always doing new things. One album will be full emo. Another will be happy beach songs. One will be a throwback to 80's synth music. But no matter what they do, it always sounds like Weezer. I know why it always sounds like Weezer
(Rivers' voice).
When I see Kevin Spacey doing anything, it's Kevin Spacey doing it. Not the character. In this case, IDK what it is about him, but it usually takes me out of the movie if it's something where he swings big, like KPax or Lex Luthor-type roles.
Have you seen the movie? He's not a redneck. He's the ruling class. I don't think this role is especially challenging, but I think what he did with it is awesome. The accent is great because he doesn't do what everybody does, and that's over-do it...but the point with Django is that he played a villain.
Leo's done a bunch of accents (Boston, Irish, South African all come to mind), and I wouldn't say he killed all of them, but he passed (because he didn't overdo it with any of them).