Third and Chavis

#28
#28
After watching Chavis as DC for many, many years, you'll come to root for 3rd and short instead of 3rd and long. I never understood why (other than soft DB coverage), but he seems to be much better at stopping 3rd and 4 or less than he is at stopping 3rd and 5+.

I can literally remember watching games in the 2006-2008 seasons hoping for the opposing RB to gain 4 yards to get it to 3rd and 2, because I had much more faith that the D could pull off the 3rd down stop in those short yardage situations.
Tell me about it. 3rd and 2 I felt pretty confident. 3rd and 18 I knew it was going to be bad.
 
#30
#30
Hate to say it, but you might be seeing that again this year. Especially if we are own our own side of the 50.

I don't care if it's a out, slant, curl that the three wideouts are running. I just don't ever want to see a draw on 3rd and 10+ again on a consistent basis
 
#31
#31
I don't care if it's a out, slant, curl that the three wideouts are running. I just don't ever want to see a draw on 3rd and 10+ again on a consistent basis

Or the screen for -6. That was another third and long staple.
 

VN Store



Back
Top