UTwild82
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2011
- Messages
- 5,688
- Likes
- 8,553
So, the argument is: "They were beaten so bad, they obviously can't be worse than the ones who beat them so bad"?
If they were all competitive games, that wouldn't have shown them well matched?
So, the argument is: "They were beaten so bad, they obviously can't be worse than the ones who beat them so bad"?
If they were all competitive games, that wouldn't have shown them well matched?
Yeah, that's more or less how I read it: "some teams got beat so bad early on, that their players gave up and they played even worse, resulting in a real blowout, which means they really were better teams than they appeared to be."
Maxxx, your OP really didn't make much sense, and your explanations haven't cleared it up any.
I'm sorry you're not enjoying this bowl season, but I gotta tell you, as a Vols fan, I'm having a blast. Oh, and btw, there were a LOT of really good, competitive games right up until the 30th of December. If you missed those, that's too bad. They were some great games (though none involving the SEC, sadly).
... Take a look at this thread, and notice that someone else started with the big 10 stuff. Not me. Why are you guys so threatened by the big 10 that you have to mention them even when others don't??
Its the way some teams played. If you don't watch a lot of football and see many of these teams play then you cant understand what I am talking about. I watch Pac12 games late at night, I watch big 12 games on fox sports, I watch big 10 games on the big 10 network, I watch sec games on the sec network, I watch acc games as well. That fact is I have seen these teams a time or two and some of them played totally flat and lifeless ball. I'm not saying the teams that got blown out should have somehow won or are better than the teams they lost to. There were games I was looking at in which the winning team could have scored 100 points if they wanted to. Too many teams just did not come to play, and that is disappointing.
Its the way some teams played. If you don't watch a lot of football and see many of these teams play then you cant understand what I am talking about. I watch Pac12 games late at night, I watch big 12 games on fox sports, I watch big 10 games on the big 10 network, I watch sec games on the sec network, I watch acc games as well. That fact is I have seen these teams a time or two and some of them played totally flat and lifeless ball. I'm not saying the teams that got blown out should have somehow won or are better than the teams they lost to. There were games I was looking at in which the winning team could have scored 100 points if they wanted to. Too many teams just did not come to play, and that is disappointing.
No, not just the bowls. Keep track of inter-conference results from the regular season, as well:
![]()
So really, it seems that for you, it comes down to sour grapes.
Hate to say that, but I can't read it any other way based on what you've told us.
This chart speaks to what I am saying. The W/L are very close between the leagues. This chart suggests that the leagues are pretty well matched up. In theory, we should not be seeing evenly matched teams playing 50-7 blowout games, no matter what league they are in. I don't think Florida get hammered like that if they played again. The same with MSU, OKSt, Iowa. LSU and UT probably win like they did 9 of 10 times, but I cant see AUB doing that to UM again or GSU beating BGSU like that again.
How is it sour grapes if I am referring to teams that I don't even like?? Yes, I like the Big 10, but I also like the SEC. Just the constant chirping from SEC fans gets really annoying. Why the hell would I not be a UT and SEC fan, yet be on this site?? BTW, the avatar pic is of an old UT player, my dad. So, I would not think the term sour grapes applies here. I'm happy with the UT win, but disappointed by the big games that turned out to be terrible for the most part.
Damn right I am. I'm also a huge UT fan. Above all, I am a sports and football fan. I have the ability to remove my allegiances and give an accurate, non bias opinion. Bottom line is that there were way too many blowouts to think that the differences are that big between the schools and leagues.
I have listened to all the talk about the conferences and who's best, who's worse. In my eyes its all BS when the games play out like they did this year. The real truth is that the top tier teams in all of the power leagues can go toe to toe. They all have the same type of athletes and pump players to the NFL. The amount of blowouts this year is no real indication of the level of play in the leagues, and for sure not a true sign of the teams competition levels. I see a lot of football games and I saw teams that played totally different in the bowl game, than I saw them play over several regular season games. One can only conclude that the SEC had the best bowl season, and the biggest wins. But the way teams were laying down all over the place, it doesn't carry much weight with me. These teams really need to bring there A games to the biggest stages.
Damn right I am. I'm also a huge UT fan. Above all, I am a sports and football fan. I have the ability to remove my allegiances and give an accurate, non bias opinion. Bottom line is that there were way too many blowouts to think that the differences are that big between the schools and leagues.
How is it sour grapes if I am referring to teams that I don't even like?? Yes, I like the Big 10, but I also like the SEC. Just the constant chirping from SEC fans gets really annoying. Why the hell would I not be a UT and SEC fan, yet be on this site?? BTW, the avatar pic is of an old UT player, my dad. So, I would not think the term sour grapes applies here. I'm happy with the UT win, but disappointed by the big games that turned out to be terrible for the most part.
The flaw I see here is that you are only going off of bowl games it seems. I know you guys here don't like the big 10, but you cant throw away the two teams that played for the big 10 title because they looked like poop in a bowl game. So one game speaks to the type of teams they are more than the whole season?? Don't forget that MSU beat OSU with a backup QB on the road. Yet you put OSU on your "big boy" list. Its not just for big 10 teams either. OK st is much better than they showed as well
This chart speaks to what I am saying. The W/L are very close between the leagues. This chart suggests that the leagues are pretty well matched up. In theory, we should not be seeing evenly matched teams playing 50-7 blowout games, no matter what league they are in. I don't think Florida get hammered like that if they played again. The same with MSU, OKSt, Iowa. LSU and UT probably win like they did 9 of 10 times, but I cant see AUB doing that to UM again or GSU beating BGSU like that again.