EconVol92
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 1,338
- Likes
- 3,064
Not true. LSU, ole miss, Mizzu all good. A&M fired their coach before the season was over. Kentucky is decent but come onYou're playing a pathetically disingenuous game where you attempt to pretend every team short of Bama and Georgia isn't "good".
It's insanely dumb. Yes, both of those were good teams. Both would've been 8 win teams if we weren't in their way.
We were handling Bama until the second half. So they didn’t really mash our faces in. UGA and Missouri did. UF was just a game lost because of injuries.Florida was terrible.
Alabama, Georgia, and Missouri mashed our faces in.
Nothing about any of them was "Good" despite three of those teams being excellent. Those good teams and a terrible team beat the boys around badly. Tennessee wasn't even on the same level with them so what they went on to do to good teams after making Tennessee lick the white dog **** is irrelevant to me.
TA&M and Kentucky were both good wins.
I think by that point in the year, it was just obvious what we were going to be limited to offensively, so long as Milton was playing. It’s crazy how when the team doesn’t believe in the guy back there… None of them play as well as they are capable of.That Mizzou loss still doesn’t look good no matter what. That was the worst performance under Heupel and I hope to never see anything like that again. The team didn’t even show up.
I don't disagree that the D wasn't great, but for some reason fans have somewhat given the offense a pass this season. There were many stretches the offense just disappeared (mostly in the second half of games).Mizzou game this year just like South Crackolins game last year… zero effort on D smh
We should beat Kentucky and there is nothing that indicates that a loss to them is just more than a blip on the radar.
As far as A&M is concerned they fired their coach they were playing so bad, so I have to respectfully disagree with you saying that either much less both were good wins.