Fight in gay adoption case was 'whirlwind,' Florida man says - CNN.com
This is good to see, imo. The courts were right: there is NO rational basis for such rules.
Yes. There really is. Drop all the religious and moral reasons and you are still left with cold, hard statistics and studies.
Children raised in a home with their natural mother and father who are married to one another perform better in every single measure than any other group. Behind that group are those raised in a home with one parent married to a new spouse.
Cohabitating parents, a cohabitating parent with a different partner, and single parent homes led by a mother perform much worse.
The more frequently partners change, the worse the children do. No group shows less monogomous, stable, long term commitments than homosexuals and particularly homosexual men.
Studies have shown conclusively that children NEED a direct, constant, and intimate relationship with a mother and a father in order to develop properly. Two men or two women no matter how much they might want to... cannot provide everything the child needs emotionally.
This isn't something to be toyed with or some PC non-sense. This is the lives of children. NO ONE has a right to ruin a child's life just because they want to feel good about themselves.
When you post your angry response, don't just throw your opinions out... don't just accuse me of being "hateful" or whatever... SHOW YOUR TANGIBLE PROOF.
Are there rare anecdotal cases where homosexuals stay together faithfully for long periods? Yes. Could there be occasions when homosexuals would rear children well? Maybe. But the statistics and science are against both.
This ruling is absolute PC madness.
