Tito the Builder

#1

MG1968

That’s No Moon…
Joined
Sep 17, 2006
Messages
28,387
Likes
19,291
#1
what a guy! He made Alan Colmes look like an even bigger idiot than he normally is, especially with the line about his sunglasses are meant to "intimidate Colmes."

Michelle Malkin Tito the Builder brings down the house

some of you, like Lawgator, may have trouble clicking on a link to Michelle Malkin's website, but the video is elsewhere.
 
#2
#2
Nice to see an immigrant that believes in America. I live in South Florida and most of the Cuban Americans are rather conservative and are for McCain.
 
#3
#3
For home pipe repairs and backdoor plumbing CALL TITO the BUILDER! Always finishes the JOB with a happy ending!
 
#4
#4
The point is good though - Dem operatives went after JTP just because he asked a tough question that resulted in an Obama gaffe. Obama and Biden mocked JTP - I thought they were for the little guy? I thought they were against the politics of personal destruction.
 
#5
#5
what a guy! He made Alan Colmes look like an even bigger idiot than he normally is, especially with the line about his sunglasses are meant to "intimidate Colmes."

Michelle Malkin Tito the Builder brings down the house

some of you, like Lawgator, may have trouble clicking on a link to Michelle Malkin's website, but the video is elsewhere.

lets base the entire campaign on Joe the Plummer and Tito the builder. Sunglasses and literally talks out of the side of his mouth. I am embarrassed by these two individuals. It is not very hard to make Colmes look like an idiot that was so productive. This does more damage to the show than good.
 
#6
#6
Joe the Plumber stands to make a lot of money off this election. Book deal, country music album. Who needs a plumbing business?
 
#7
#7
lets base the entire campaign on Joe the Plummer and Tito the builder. Sunglasses and literally talks out of the side of his mouth. I am embarrassed by these two individuals. It is not very hard to make Colmes look like an idiot that was so productive. This does more damage to the show than good.

what on earth do you care for? You're in the tank for Obama. I guess you didn't mind when Obama trotted out those pathetic families during his infomercial and exploited them for his own personal political gain.

If you want to be embarrassed for somebody, try Chris Matthews. His semi-homesexual man-crush on Obama has ruined whatever was left of his journalistic credibility.
 
#8
#8
what a guy! He made Alan Colmes look like an even bigger idiot than he normally is, especially with the line about his sunglasses are meant to "intimidate Colmes."

Michelle Malkin Tito the Builder brings down the house

some of you, like Lawgator, may have trouble clicking on a link to Michelle Malkin's website, but the video is elsewhere.


Michelle Malkin is a hottie. If I could just keep her from talking or writing or communicating really in any way, I'd be in love.
 
#9
#9
Joe the Plumber stands to make a lot of money off this election. Book deal, country music album. Who needs a plumbing business?


Evidently even he didn't need one, if by business you mean one properly licensed and paying taxes.
 
#10
#10
lets base the entire campaign on Joe the Plummer and Tito the builder. Sunglasses and literally talks out of the side of his mouth. I am embarrassed by these two individuals. It is not very hard to make Colmes look like an idiot that was so productive. This does more damage to the show than good.

You're embarrassed that the guy has an eye problem and had to wear protection as a result? Honestly, the campaign should have been decided once and for all by Obama's answer to Joe's question. That answer should result in a landslide victory for McCain.
 
#11
#11
You're embarrassed that the guy has an eye problem and had to wear protection as a result? Honestly, the campaign should have been decided once and for all by Obama's answer to Joe's question. That answer should result in a landslide victory for McCain.

I am embarrassed by the fact that J. McCain has to resort to two henchmen to deliver a message he cannot. Futhermore I am embarrassed by the fact that any Republican would take any pride in putting an idiot like Colmes in there place. He is an idiot so now what is he an idiot x2 or to the 2nd power. These two henchmen are what they are total distractions. If McCain had chosen a decent Running Mate and stuck to his orginal Campaign it would be a landslide. Realistically he didn't and stands the chance of losing by a landslide.
 
#12
#12
I am embarrassed by the fact that J. McCain has to resort to two henchmen to deliver a message he cannot. Futhermore I am embarrassed by the fact that any Republican would take any pride in putting an idiot like Colmes in there place. He is an idiot so now what is he an idiot x2 or to the 2nd power. These two henchmen are what they are total distractions. If McCain had chosen a decent Running Mate and stuck to his orginal Campaign it would be a landslide. Realistically he didn't and stands the chance of losing by a landslide.

I don't think Joe has really come out in favor of McCain, he's just stated that he's not a fan of Obama.
 
#13
#13
what on earth do you care for? You're in the tank for Obama. I guess you didn't mind when Obama trotted out those pathetic families during his infomercial and exploited them for his own personal political gain.

If you want to be embarrassed for somebody, try Chris Matthews. His semi-homesexual man-crush on Obama has ruined whatever was left of his journalistic credibility.

You have no idea do you. Tank for Obama not exactly. Realistic yes.
 
#14
#14
I am embarrassed by the fact that J. McCain has to resort to two henchmen to deliver a message he cannot. Futhermore I am embarrassed by the fact that any Republican would take any pride in putting an idiot like Colmes in there place. He is an idiot so now what is he an idiot x2 or to the 2nd power. These two henchmen are what they are total distractions. If McCain had chosen a decent Running Mate and stuck to his orginal Campaign it would be a landslide. Realistically he didn't and stands the chance of losing by a landslide.
you've taken leave of your mind.
 
#16
#16
You have no idea do you. Tank for Obama not exactly. Realistic yes.

the fact that you think Joe and Tito are "henchmen" and your undying devotion to Colin Powell give me reason to think, like BPV, that you've lost your mind.
 
#17
#17
the fact that you think Joe and Tito are "henchmen" and your undying devotion to Colin Powell give me reason to think, like BPV, that you've lost your mind.

r2d2 get a life. What about Palin and Joe throwing John McCain under the bus. I do not guess you like that either. The truth hurts does it not? It must be a war injury I guess what is your excuse?
 
#18
#18
r2d2 get a life. What about Palin and Joe throwing John McCain under the bus. I do not guess you like that either. The truth hurts does it not? It must be a war injury I guess what is your excuse?

in my best John Bender imitation, "What are you babbling about?"
 
#19
#19
in my best John Bender imitation, "What are you babbling about?"

Is this deflective reasoning or can you not follow your own threads. A you losing your mind or did you just start drinking early today.
 
#20
#20
Is this deflective reasoning or can you not follow your own threads. A you losing your mind or did you just start drinking early today.

I'm just trying to figure out why you think Joe and Tito are henchmen. Or how Palin and Joe have thrown McCain under the bus. You're normally pretty verbose and unfortunately I'm not a mind reader.
 
#21
#21
I'm just trying to figure out why you think Joe and Tito are henchmen. Or how Palin and Joe have thrown McCain under the bus. You're normally pretty verbose and unfortunately I'm not a mind reader.

Palin and Joe are only concerned about one thing: 'themselves'. The jury is still out on Tito. They are also trying to convey msgs on their own agendas for themselves and they do not represent the real John McCain. It must be very important for you to defend this so what is your point.
 
#22
#22
Palin and Joe are only concerned about one thing: 'themselves'. The jury is still out on Tito. They are also trying to convey msgs on their own agendas for themselves and they do not represent the real John McCain. It must be very important for you to defend this so what is your point.

you're still babbling. Joe isn't some conspiracy, he just had the gall to ask the Obamassiah a question he couldn't answer without exposing his Marxist viewpoints. What followed was a democrat operative in the Ohio government accessing Joe's personal records in an effort to dig up dirt.

Colin Powell's endorsement of Obama was out of concern for "himself", but you were swept up in the moment like Chris Matthews after an Obama speech. If my defense of Joe and Tito is inexplicable (to you) then your defense of Powell is equally inexplicable (to me).
 
#23
#23
you're still babbling. Joe isn't some conspiracy, he just had the gall to ask the Obamassiah a question he couldn't answer without exposing his Marxist viewpoints. What followed was a democrat operative in the Ohio government accessing Joe's personal records in an effort to dig up dirt.

Colin Powell's endorsement of Obama was out of concern for "himself", but you were swept up in the moment like Chris Matthews after an Obama speech. If my defense of Joe and Tito is inexplicable (to you) then your defense of Powell is equally inexplicable (to me).

I seriously think you are the one that is babbling. From Palin, Joe and Tito you have added in your babbling the following.

Conspiracy, Marxism, the Ohio Govt, Joe's Personal Records, Colin Powell, Chris Matthews, Defense of Powell

You sound like Kieth Olberman. Babbling. I know it must be hard for you to stay on the subject but where on earth did the above topics come into play. (ADD?) They didn't until you babbled them off.
 
#24
#24
I seriously think you are the one that is babbling. From Palin, Joe and Tito you have added in your babbling the following.

Conspiracy, Marxism, the Ohio Govt, Joe's Personal Records, Colin Powell, Chris Matthews, Defense of Powell

You sound like Kieth Olberman. Babbling. I know it must be hard for you to stay on the subject but where on earth did the above topics come into play. They didn't until you babbled them off.

I'm willing to bet the men under your command never had a clue where they stood with you. I'm glad I never had to experience such poor leadership outside of Basic Training.
 
#25
#25
I'm willing to bet the men under your command never had a clue where they stood with you. I'm glad I never had to experience such poor leadership outside of Basic Training.
what makes you think he was a commander?
 

VN Store



Back
Top