Is this a serious question?
Go back and read the previous conversations, and you'll know if it's serious or not. The person I was talking to originally stated that Meyer wasn't as good as General and Bear (I do not agree with this sentiment); yet, he stated that Saban was the best. I was asking what made Saban better than General and Bear, and not Meyer. Imo, Neyland is in a class all to his own, he's not the greatest, he's not top 5, he's not top 20 or 100...he just is. If anyone ever asks me, who's the GOAT, I say Neyland because he's Neyland, and just because...not to mention, he has a strong claim.
However, without my heart, and going by logic, what my own eyes have seen, the way sports/football has changed, and just because it's a fact: Nick Saban is the greatest college football coach to ever live, and thats just the truth. As much a it pains me to say and believe it, it just is. But, as much as it sickens me to say that, it sickens me just as much to say and believe that Meyer is second on that list. Can't deny what that man has done in college football, no matter how much I would like to. Saban is GOAT, but Meyer is up there with him, imo...a close second, I go as far as saying. Meyer was one of the foremost of revolutionizing the game into the 21st Century, for good or bad...the modern offense, and Meyer was doing it at Bowling Green. Not to mention, the record itself speaks for itself, as do the championships...Meyer has won 85% of his games, over 17 seasons...NO ONE touches that.
Point being, what makes Saban better than the old timers, and not Meyer?