Nobody cares where he's from. We want him because he is electric, not because he's from TN.
in the end, this is accurate. but there is something to say about keeping the best in state players home, especially when those players are being recruited at a high level.
the biggest reason that's important is just the negative recruiting that goes on when in state players do go someplace else, especially the ones we do want. to me, the in state recruiting issue is much less about on field, and more about perceptions. it makes it harder to go after and get the in state players you do covet. that's the problem. it's not that in state recruiting sucks. it's that when you want the kid from Chattanooga, all he's been hearing is how TN never gets this or that, and look at all these in state kids that left, they don't care about TN kids. etc, etc, etc.
that said, that absolutely cannot be the driving force behind a decision to go after a kid in state, just because it'd look bad if we didn't get him. no coach should do that. so don't get me wrong. you go get the players you want, that you have evaluations for, and fit your system, culture etc... if they're from TN, bonus. if not, don't care.
it's really a balancing act, especially for us given how many schools do recruit TN, proximity to Knoxville vs. AL, OM, MSU, ARK, UK, LSU, MO etc...and that while the overall talent level in TN is rising, the margin for error on the top prospects in TN is still razor thin when compared to a few of our neighboring states.
so while i understand why in state recruiting gets special attention.....at the end of the day, it won't matter if the kids we do get are as good or better.