Jackcrevol
Ain't Got Time!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
- Messages
- 64,899
- Likes
- 164,502
If we get to 6 wins and win the bowl game, does that increase our recruiting prowls and push McDonald and French out, to get some big dogs in this class? Are they really a want or just a take because of the way the season has gone so far? I know some on here are giddy about the trio, I'm just not that high on them. Not saying they can't be good players at some point but are you taking one of those 2 over Sewell, Washington? Who would get the git, if not them to make room?
If we get to 6 wins and win the bowl game, does that increase our recruiting prowls and push McDonald and French out, to get some big dogs in this class? Are they really a want or just a take because of the way the season has gone so far? I know some on here are giddy about the trio, I'm just not that high on them. Not saying they can't be good players at some point but are you taking one of those 2 over Sewell, Washington? Who would get the git, if not them to make room?
Why on Earth would we only take 23? We desperately need depth. We still need another WR most likely as well.I think it puts us at 17 commits with these three and McDonald counts for the secondary. If we only take 23 that leaves 6 slots so you have to guess hardy, baron, Omari for dline then Sewell and Darnell then one more for oline or dline
We’ve already looked at another LS. I believe we encourage our LS to be a preferred walk on because of our numbers. Williamson I think is another that becomes a preferred walk on with his injury. We need bodies at LB right now badly.No panic. Just presenting the question. Do you piss Memphis off to land better talent or are you stuck since you have taken them already because you don't want to piss Memphis off?