To Protect and to Serve II

I've said before that I'm cop fam. I'm one of only two men on my dad's side who has not been employed by a police or sheriff's department at some point (grandpa was a beat cop in Chattanooga, as were all three of his sons; dad left the force in his mid twenties and is now working for them again).

I was having a very frank conversation with one of my first cousins about the need to weed out bad cops. We're both in agreement that it has to happen, but there needs to be some way to do it more efficiently without placing good cops at risk.

My cousin was open with the fact that questioning cops' behavior from the inside has led and will lead to "accidents" while on duty. Reporting a cop up the chain, he believes, will likely lead to a friendly fire incident. Especially with officers who espouse supremacist or racist views and act display more violent behavior towards citizens of color.

I take him at his word. These problems could be fixed on the front end by better profiling and evaluation of potential cadets. Get rid of the mess before it gets in the door.

But what do we do with the ones already there, when the ranks close to protect their own even when they don't like their own?
Yes, there are elements of racism in police departments, just like there would be in many other professions. But my focus hasn't even been on that because I think that is a smaller issue than what it is being made out to be.

We simply have far too many people that are attracted to the profession that want to do the cowboy/shootem'ups, high speed chases and arrest as many folk as possible over any infraction because that is what they see on TV. In general, far too many of these people don't understand or appreciate the rights of the people, they don't care about the major consequences that occur when they come into a situation like a bull into a china shop throwing their weight around bullying folks and they don't feel that the law applies to them. They look at civilians as people they can kick around and fleece. And what these brainwashed copsucker conservatives fail to realize is that these very same cops they worship will be the very same ones knocking on your door to take away your guns when that time comes or at the very minimum, will escort them out of their homes on a bogus domestic violence charge if they are a man.
 
I've said before that I'm cop fam. I'm one of only two men on my dad's side who has not been employed by a police or sheriff's department at some point (grandpa was a beat cop in Chattanooga, as were all three of his sons; dad left the force in his mid twenties and is now working for them again).

I was having a very frank conversation with one of my first cousins about the need to weed out bad cops. We're both in agreement that it has to happen, but there needs to be some way to do it more efficiently without placing good cops at risk.

My cousin was open with the fact that questioning cops' behavior from the inside has led and will lead to "accidents" while on duty. Reporting a cop up the chain, he believes, will likely lead to a friendly fire incident. Especially with officers who espouse supremacist or racist views and act display more violent behavior towards citizens of color.

I take him at his word. These problems could be fixed on the front end by better profiling and evaluation of potential cadets. Get rid of the mess before it gets in the door.

But what do we do with the ones already there, when the ranks close to protect their own even when they don't like their own?

Just to summarize, cops will kill fellow cops if they report bad behavior, cops are white supremacists, racists and are violent towards POC? Did I miss anything?
 
That's a massive oversimplification.

I am sorry you feel you have to act like this.

My cousin was open with the fact that questioning cops' behavior from the inside has led and will lead to "accidents" while on duty. Reporting a cop up the chain, he believes, will likely lead to a friendly fire incident. Especially with officers who espouse supremacist or racist views and act display more violent behavior towards citizens of color.
These aren't my words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
These aren't my words.

Nor did your representation match the spirit of mine.

Yes, some individuals will seek retribution for having their behavior exposed.

Yes, a percentage of officers hold abhorrent views concerning their fellow children of the Divine.

Not all. Your reduction did not reflect that.
 
Nor did your representation match the spirit of mine.

Yes, some individuals will seek retribution for having their behavior exposed.

Yes, a percentage of officers hold abhorrent views concerning their fellow children of the Divine.

Not all. Your reduction did not reflect that.
Is that caveat really necessary? Of course "not all".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
Which one is the hero in this case? All cops are hero's right?
I don’t know but today’s list of hero’s is long. Heroes are :
-teachers
-people who vote
-people who get vaccinated
-people that report others to authorities
-parents that don’t abuse their children
-COVID survivors
-any sort of situation in which someone was victimized
-people who received govt stimulus
 
I don’t know but today’s list of hero’s is long. Heroes are :
-teachers
-people who vote
-people who get vaccinated
-people that report others to authorities
-parents that don’t abuse their children
-COVID survivors
-any sort of situation in which someone was victimized
-people who received govt stimulus
You don't want to get me started on the "hero" culture that exists today.
 
In this particular situation in Arkansas, the outrage is over two items. First, the lack of proportionality with regards to how to handle a minor offense. These cops have no problem jeopardizing or ruining lives over some reefer, a tinted windows, not wearing a mask, or some other petty infraction. That dumb azz cop could have killed someone not just in the vehicle, but jeopardized the lives of people in other lanes of traffic or himself even... over speeding on a highway with light traffic and no weather restrictions/limitations. Cars can safely travel at 80 mph on these highways in the right conditions. This clown made the roads more dangerous.

And then secondly, the fact that he doesn't get charged. "The cops investigated the situation and we found that the cop did nothing wrong." Or, "The DA investigated the cop and the DA found that the cop did nothing wrong." Whatever... cops and the judicial system protect one another but terrorize the civilians. They are above common folks.

The cops vs the people

...
 
I've said before that I'm cop fam. I'm one of only two men on my dad's side who has not been employed by a police or sheriff's department at some point (grandpa was a beat cop in Chattanooga, as were all three of his sons; dad left the force in his mid twenties and is now working for them again).

I was having a very frank conversation with one of my first cousins about the need to weed out bad cops. We're both in agreement that it has to happen, but there needs to be some way to do it more efficiently without placing good cops at risk.

My cousin was open with the fact that questioning cops' behavior from the inside has led and will lead to "accidents" while on duty. Reporting a cop up the chain, he believes, will likely lead to a friendly fire incident. Especially with officers who espouse supremacist or racist views and act display more violent behavior towards citizens of color.

I take him at his word. These problems could be fixed on the front end by better profiling and evaluation of potential cadets. Get rid of the mess before it gets in the door.

But what do we do with the ones already there, when the ranks close to protect their own even when they don't like their own?
Your cousin watches too many movies
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens

I had a response, but it's been a long day, and a long week. I'm already tired, and I'm working day shift at the SO tomorrow. Patrol is critically short. A lot on my mind, and you know how I defend those of us who took the oath to Serve and Protect seriously. You also know where I stand on those who betray that oath.

So I had a response..thought it over right after I posted it...and then deleted it. Moving forward, I'll answer for my actions, and the actions of those under my control. That's all I can do. For those who hate us, nothing I can post here will ever change your mind. And I have no control over, or sympathy for, those who betray their oath. I won't hand you a pitchfork or light your torch, but I also won't stand in your way. This is my last year on the line. It's time.

I'm a sheepdog. I guard the flock. If you're a predator, I'm looking for you. If you're not, then I'm as harmless as a poodle fart.

'night, Raz. Long day tomorrow.
 

Looks dumb but as usual, the Tweeters lie about the situation, he's 19 and this wasn't his first issue with these officers.

I don't see a reason to tase him, unless they thought he was going for something in his backpack with his left hand, but that's a stretch to me
 
Looks dumb but as usual, the Tweeters lie about the situation, he's 19 and this wasn't his first issue with these officers.

I don't see a reason to tase him, unless they thought he was going for something in his backpack with his left hand, but that's a stretch to me
So those prior incidents must have made it ok to taser him in this instance? Was he fleeing or resisting? And vaping? Really?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
So those prior incidents must have made it ok to taser him in this instance? Was re fleeing or resisting? And vaping? Really?
If you read the actual story, he was refusing to leave private property which he been asked to do several times by both businesses and the police and they made the decision to arrest him for trespassing and he refused to get his ID out and begin to walk away and cuss at them, you can't walk away once you are being arrested or cited. Now i personally wouldn't tased him and I think that is excessive, however as usual with these stories, the "a 17 year old was arrested for just vaping" isnt even close to the actual truth.
 
If you read the actual story, he was refusing to leave private property which he been asked to do several times by both businesses and the police and they made the decision to arrest him for trespassing and he refused to get his ID out and begin to walk away and cuss at them, you can't walk away once you are being arrested or cited. Now i personally wouldn't tased him and I think that is excessive, however as usual with these stories, the "a 17 year old was arrested for just vaping" isnt even close to the actual truth.
That is the entire point of the video, sir. Of course it was excessive...
 
That is the entire point of the video, sir. Of course it was excessive...
yes but that doesn't mean that one buys in BS lying narratives instead of actual facts. Each criminal case involves a myriad of different circumstances that decides whether use of force is justified or not.

This is one that will likely fall under the "it's legally sound" but a grey area of necessity
 

VN Store



Back
Top