Tom Watson -vs- Tiger Woods

#28
#28
Sure it is and the Norman-Couples thread is dumb as well.

Norman Couples was at least worth some discussion. I think Couples is the more naturally talented player. Losing his putting was a big deal, ailing back and lackadaisical approach ended him.

Norman clearly had the better career, but there was some debate about ability. Between Woods and Watson, there is no debate.
 
#29
#29
Norman Couples was at least worth some discussion. I think Couples is the more naturally talented player. Losing his putting was a big deal, ailing back and lackadaisical approach ended him.

Norman clearly had the better career, but there was some debate about ability. Between Woods and Watson, there is no debate.

Agree, although I believe Norman to be a great athlete. I can't see Freddy on a pair of skis lining up for a black diamond run. Norman's been there and done that
 
#30
#30
Agree, although I believe Norman to be a great athlete. I can't see Freddy on a pair of skis lining up for a black diamond run. Norman's been there and done that

Norman's a strong athlete, but Freddie just has more effortless pop and hits it more solidly more often. Freddie also flights the ball better more naturally.

I think Norman is one of the best ever, but don't think he's more talented than Freddie. Definitely worked harder and it paid off.
 
#31
#31
Norman's a strong athlete, but Freddie just has more effortless pop and hits it more solidly more often. Freddie also flights the ball better more naturally.

I think Norman is one of the best ever, but don't think he's more talented than Freddie. Definitely worked harder and it paid off.

Agree
 
#34
#34
Tom Watson = one of the 20 best golfers of all time
Tiger Woods = one of the 3 best golfers of all time
 

VN Store



Back
Top