Considering Oklahoma has done the same against better competition shows how much you have to learn.
Just because Oklahoma has done it doesn't mean Missouri is exactly bad. This early, a spot or two in the polls isn't going to make that much of a difference.
Missouri beat a ranked team, did they not?
OU combined opponent's record: 2-5
Mizzou's: 4-6
Both of Nevada's losses, Mizzou's most recent ass kicking, are to ranked teams. (L to TTU 35-19)
All three of Washington's losses are to ranked teams. Barely lost to BYU, (L to Oregon 44-10)
Margins of victory (avg) favors OU by a little.
Oklahoma: 40.67
Missouri: 37.67
I haven't seen OU play as much, and i don't think they have scored on each of their last 13 posessions, including 12 of those being touchdowns.
Truth is, we don't know exactly how good their opponents are at this point. Missouri has beaten a ranked team, though.
Missouri's offense is lighting things up, but I definitely understand why people have OU ranked higher, won't argue against it... but don't be a dick for someone giving their opinion.